The United Nations, the World Bank (WB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have declared the employment of women as a major factor in securing high economic growth, alleviating poverty, creating economic prosperity, and empowering women in various countries across the world. Therefore, under the banner of "women as economic drivers",  these institutions and a number of other Western organisations are pushing forward this idea as a major project internationally, by planning and financing them in developing countries, especially in South East Asia and Turkey. According to the World Bank, "The challenge for Turkey is to improve the access of women to economic opportunities and jobs, as this will increase total productive employment in Turkey. Increasing female employment could significantly boost economic growth and reduce poverty in Turkey: World Bank estimates suggest that increasing the share of women who work full-time by just 6 percentage points could increase income by 7 percent and reduce poverty by 15 percent". [1]

Economists have stated that Turkey faces a large gender gap in labour force participation. Only 29 percent of Turkish women (defined as being between the ages of 15-64 years) in Turkey are active in the labour market, which is the lowest rate in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and female labour force participation in the country has declined since 1988. According to the World Bank this decline in female labour force participation is a result of the migration of families from rural to urban areas, and the occupational changes associated with this internal migration, as women in rural areas tend to work on family land and other traditional sectors, contributing to family income and welfare. When they move to the cities however, women who have only a basic primary education struggle to compete for urban jobs and, in the absence of adequate child care facilities, often stay at home to look after their children and family. According to some economists, this leads to further de-skilling and thus may explain the long lasting downward trend in labour force participation.[2]

Consequently, the World Bank in partnership with a number of Turkish institutions is undertaking various actions and initiatives to increase female employment in the country. These institutions include the Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen Association (TUSIAD), the Local Chamber of Industry of Gaziantep, KOC University, the Regional Development Agency in Samsun, Women's NGOs, Central Government Agencies, the Undersecretariat of Treasury, State Ministry in charge of the Status of Women, Ministry of Labor and Social Security, and the Equality Commission of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM). In addition, the factors underlying low female employment in Turkey and the benefits of getting more women to work have and are been covered widely in the society, including in local and international media, in publications on major websites in Turkey, and during discussions at numerous events both inside and outside the country, all of which has generated a false understanding of the cause and solutions of poverty and unfortunately made women embrace these erroneous ideas of economic improvement.

The Turkish Government has also implemented a number of actions and plans in order to increase women in work according to the suggestions of the World Bank. In May 2010 the Turkish Prime Ministry issued a ‘Circular on Female Employment' laying out provisions to ensure gender equality in the workplace, engendering vocational training and non-formal education to the needs of women, and increasing access of working mothers to child care services. In February 2011, the Government extended incentives to employers for hiring women, and introduced incentives for self-employed women and part-time workers. Preschool services have also been expanding since October 2009. [3]

On the 22nd of October 2013, the Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policy, the Government of Sweden [Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (SIDA)] and the WB launched a project to support increasing access of women to economic opportunities in Turkey. This project will be funded by SIDA with about 4.5 million US Dollars and will receive technical assistance from the WB. Also the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) granted a 60 million US Dollar credit last year via the privatized banks in Turkey to aid women in opening their own enterprises.

Currently the Turkish government under the leadership of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), who have adopted the idea of "Women as Economic Drivers" is also preparing to announce a new employment package regarding paid maternity leave and flexible working conditions for new mothers. The package, entitled "Female Employment and Birth" is aimed at incentivising women with children to stay in employment and will extend paid maternity leave to 18 or 19 weeks from the current 16 and provide flexible working conditions for new mothers. The government initially planned to extend paid maternity leave to six months, but due to the strong backlash from industry bosses, this idea was revised and replaced by options allowing women to work on a part-time basis for up to six months in their current jobs. The package also introduces new rules for employees to protect women from demotion or a suspension in rank. Employers will be obliged to continue the employment of a worker after completing her paid or unpaid leave.

However, all these plans and actions will not aid Turkey's women to climb out of poverty! This is all nothing more than covering the wounds in Turkey's economy with plasters, by forcing women to provide for themselves and their families and to contribute to the economic improvement of the country at any cost - a fact which is also seen by other organisations and women's unions in the country. It is an irrefutable fact that the root cause of the poverty and economic hardship facing millions in Turkey today is not a result of low numbers of women in the workforce, nor simply due to the failings of the current government. It is rather a direct result of the implementation of secular capitalism and its liberal free-market economic system and liberalization policies in the country. This means that no matter which government comes into power under this system, it will be doomed to fail. And it explains why very little has changed in the poverty line and degree of economic hardship affecting the population over the past few years. Today, 12 million Turks live under the poverty line - that's 16% of Turkey's population. Those at risk of persistent poverty are more than 14 million people, and the proportion of the population who have severe financial problems is around 60%.[4] Such harsh realities are the direct fallout of flawed financial decisions, interest-based finance, and policies such as the privatisation of natural resources that have stemmed from the defective economic basis of the capitalist free-market model of organising economies.

For example, in order to amass the money to close interest-based debts to the IMF amounting to 22 billion USD, Turkey implemented a number of policies suggested by the IMF and WB such as fixing the exchange rate, privatising major state owned industries and assets, liberalizing further its economy.

• Firstly, fixing the exchange rate meant that purchasing as well as borrowings from abroad stayed at the same price for a long term, which encouraged imports as well as foreign money owners to invest in Turkey's industries, banking and commercial sectors. Alongside the increased imports, this ability of borrowing from abroad and foreign investments also boosted the privatization of Public Economic Enterprises as private investors were able to offer the needed capital in order to buy those enterprises. As a result of this, Turkey currently has the highest external debt ever, amounting to 413 billion USD, which is about 51% of its GDP. One-third of the foreign debts belong to the state and the Central Bank, the remaining two thirds belong to the private sectors, like the construction and real estate sectors, the transportation sector, information and communication firms, the food and fodder industry, the textile and metal industry and further more. However in order to pay their debts, the private sectors had to increase their sales prices for their products which led to higher consumer prices. The energy sector, as one example, has long-term debts above 9 billion USD which has caused the increasing gas and electricity costs for the people in the country. Additionally, electricity is sold to industries and commercial sectors at even higher prices, raising their production costs, which leads to burdening consumers with higher prices for basic commodities. Another dangerous outcome of foreign money - that deceptively gives the false impression of economic growth within the country - is that it places the economy in a weak and vulnerable position, because in the case of any political or economic instability or risk, foreign investors are likely to pull out their money over night and leave the country's economy in deep difficulties.

• Secondly, Turkey's debts of USD 22 billion to the IMF were paid off through the sale of state owned-assets for 38.84 billion Dollars. At the same time, the privatization of more than 80 industrial enterprises, in particular, energy resources and providers of electricity, gas and fuel, made Turkey dependent on foreign suppliers and therefore forced it to import 75 % of its energy requirements, although having more than enough resources to provide for the country. Being dependent on foreign suppliers selling energy at higher and increasing prices, such as for fuel, led to higher costs for consumers in Turkey who pay the highest fuel prices in the world at the moment. Alongside this these higher fuel costs lead to higher production costs in agriculture, manufacturing and other sectors of society, which are then passed on to the prices of basic foodstuff, public transportation and other products in the market. Furthermore these privatizations led to the shut-down of industries resulting in increasing unemployment of over 2.5 million. It also led to the migration of over 2.3 million people to other cities away from their homes, which is also seen by the WB as a major cause of unemployment and increasing poverty in the country. Unemployment and migration hit women and children hardest -not only economically but also psychologically.

• Thirdly, due to free-market trade liberalization policies, Turkey decided two years ago to import live cattle and sheep that also became expensive because of the privatized fodder industry. These imports helped to improve the economies of the EU and US but led to a loss of more than 2.7 billion USD in foreign exchange. This figure is 2.7 times the amount Turkey invested in its own farmers and stockbreeders, who suffered under rising fodder prices. Ultimately, these imports caused an increase of meat prices for the consumers.

• And fourthly, the debts of the state that resulted from its capitalist policies were unloaded onto the masses. Government repayment of debts has in large part been raised through direct and indirect taxes upon the people, which also increased the prices of goods and the cost of living of families, hence causing a further burden to the middle and lower classes, especially since these taxes were raised through a lopsided tax system. For example, whether individuals fall into the lower, middle, or upper income brackets, they are all subjected to the same indirect 18% sales tax which is imposed on most basic necessities, goods and services, hence disproportionately affecting the rich and poor; while additionally, the sales tax for products such as caviar, widely recognised as a privilege of the wealthy is only 8%, and 0% for some precious stones. Such unjust taxes have contributed to an increased 8-fold income disparity between the rich and poor, meaning that the richest 20% received almost half of the national income, and the poorest 20% only 6%. Additionally the prices for bread, housing, education and healthcare continue to increase.

It is due to these high and rising living costs as well as the economic fall-out of other capitalist free-market policies that many women are forced to work to provide an additional income in order that their family be able to afford basic necessities. Therefore, the idea that increasing women in work will improve their living standards, while they continue to be subject to such high costs and economic hardships that have resulted from liberal policies is not only irrational, it is highly unjust for it essentially blames and burdens women with the task of solving and lifting the economic difficulties of the country that have been directly caused by its capitalist system.

Furthermore, these incentives and initiatives to push more women into employment will bring nothing but the further exploitation of women in low paid, low quality, and underqualified jobs where they are forced to work long hours. The Turkish Government's new employment package mentioned above, titled "Female Employment and Birth Package" may seem at first glance to offer a number of advantages for women who want to work and have a family at the same time, such as its promise of lowered taxes or tax breaks for families having three or more children. However, many women's unions and platforms have already opposed this package, arguing that its aim is only to force women to work in more jobs as part of the rented workforce under subcontracting which brings fewer employment rights, with the promised tax breaks in truth offering very little to improve the finances of families.

Even currently, with regards to employment, people in Turkey work 1877 hours a year, more than the OECD average of 1776 hours. Around 46% of employees - which includes women - work very long hours, much higher than the OECD average of 9%. According to Eurostat, Turkish women in general have to work more than 48 hours a week. This means working nearly 7 days a week in order to provide for their families or to afford more than just the basic needs. Nearly 53 percent of the 7.7 million female workers (4.1 million) work informally and without social security. Facts about female employment show that 2.5 million of the country's working women are in the low-paid agriculture sector.

According to TEPAV (Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey), the number of women employed outside of agriculture increased to 4.9 million in the first half of the year 2013, with a rise of 1.5 million women over the last four years. Particularly in the service sector the number of working women increased rapidly. 25% of women working outside the agricultural sector are employed in the production industry, working as cheap labour for example in the food, garment and textile sectors. [5] Considering the figures given by Türk-İş (Confederation of Turkish Trade Unions), published in August 2013 that net minimum wages amount to 868 TRY, while the hunger limit has been set at 1019 TRY and the poverty limit at 3321 TRY, [6] the exploitation of women within the workforce needs no further explanation. It is therefore clear that women under such a capitalist system will not achieve better living conditions through employment.

In addition to pushing women into the labour force, the harsh living conditions and poverty in Turkey even force children to work. "The Other Turkey Report" in November 2013, which contained a summary of the main statistics in Turkey and was published by the opposition party, the Republican Peoples Party (CHP) revealed that there were 445,000 children between the ages of 6-17 working in the country, and that the number of working children had increased by 64% between 2006 and 2012.  In 2012, 36 children lost their lives due to avoidable work accidents and just in the first 9 months of 2013, 45 children lost their lives in similar incidents. Such figures, together with the Turkish governments new employment package, show clearly that any initiatives resulting from these free-market ideas, including that of part-time working for women, and easing access to subcontracting are nothing more than easing tools for the exploitation of women and their children.

And rather than improving regulations on employment rights and working conditions, capitalist institutions such as the IMF and World Bank often call for deregulation of trade laws that often worsen the lives of workers, in order to improve profits for multinational corporations. Capitalism is undoubtedly an ideology where generating wealth speaks louder than human suffering.

Furthermore, the fact that Turkey ranks first among the OECD countries for the highest rates of female entrepreneurs is not a reflection of the economic empowerment of the country's women, as many of these businesswomen are struggling to keep afloat due to the flawed free-market principles which favour big business and corporations over smaller companies and enterprises.

It is therefore clear that increasing the numbers of women in employment under a free market system which is the invention of a flawed and unjust liberal capitalist system will not improve their economic status. The drive to push more women into work in Turkey will not lift them out of poverty but rather promises to bring further exploitation for millions of women and even children in low-paid jobs that only benefit the rich corporations and businesses, whose presence and influence was clearly visible during the preparation of the Turkish government's new employment package.

Another very important consequence of capitalism and its view of "Women as economic drivers" that is forcing women - through economic or social pressures - to gain employment is that it harms the natural desire of women to establish families and become full-time mothers, and hence also negatively affects the rights of children. In November 2013 a study was published and conducted in cooperation by the Koç and Sabancı Universities in Turkey, entitled "Family, Work and Social Gender in Turkey", revealed that 61% of women "primarily want to have a family and children, even if working might be good". In addition, 58.2% of women declared that a woman having a pre-school child should stay at home, and 43.3% agreed with the opinion that if a woman works her family will be negatively effected.[7]

These numbers are reflected in the growing difficulties that those living under secular democratic systems face across the world, including in Turkey. There is ever-increasing news about the host of problems affecting children and youth in both Muslim and non-Muslim secular states, ranging from psychological issues to drug abuse. The lack of effective care, nurturing and education that children need from their mothers who are not able to give this due to the heavy demands of work have a large part to play in causing such problems. Many issues arising within the younger generations, including delinquent or anti-social behaviour can be attributed to the reduced quality and amount of time parents in general and mothers in particular spend with their children. This, not only harms the relationship between child and parents but also affects the character of the children and results in great harms to the society. In a survey published in 2013 by the PEW Research Centre on the impact of working mothers on family life in the US, almost ¾ of respondents agreed that the increasing numbers of women working in the country has made it harder for parents to raise children. Additionally, in 2011, a UNICEF report warned that British parents were trapping their children in a cycle of "compulsive consumerism" by showering them with toys and designer clothes instead of spending quality time with them, blaming this for contributing to the riots and widespread looting which gripped the UK in the same year. Clearly, prioritising wealth creation over securing the wellbeing of children and families leads inevitably to neglecting natural desires and needs.

A number of today's prestigious female Muslim writers and psychologists especially among the Muslim populations, have also explained the many difficulties of being a woman in modern Turkish society where she faces the burden of being a mother and breadwinner for her family. They describe that this pressure upon women to race with men under the guise of ‘women's empowerment' and in the name of feminism and secular freedoms is a huge injustice to the woman.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that this faulty capitalist system that embraces the liberal free-market economy cannot lead to better lives for women and their families. Indeed, the aim of such capitalist policies, including the promotion of "Women as economic drivers" is one of exploiting women as tools to counter, conceal, and divert attention from the failed economic policies of capitalist states. The only acceptable, humane and guaranteed way out of exploitation and poverty, in addition to achieving real economic empowerment of women is through the Islamic economic system, which provides simple and implementable methods with guaranteed positive results: Firstly, Islam prohibits interest and builds an economy based on wealth creation rather than credit and debt. In addition, the prohibition of interest reduces the cost of living. Citizens and businesses who know they will not gain any benefit from placing their money in banks will therefore be inclined to use their wealth and profits to invest in enterprises or expansion of businesses that generates jobs, reducing unemployment. Secondly, Islam prohibits the privatisation of natural resources such as water, fuel, and gas, defining these as public property that all should benefit from. This again reduces the cost of living by removing the extortionate prices charged by private companies that have taken ownership of these basic necessities under the capitalist free-market system. Thirdly, Islam is based upon a low taxation model, where tax is paid on excess wealth, as seen with Zakat, or for example imposed upon land-owners and calculated according to the produce that they grow in their lands in a fair and just manner that does not over-burden them. At the same time, Islam prohibits stealth taxes such as general sales tax on products that place an unfair economic burden on the poor compared to the rich. This again lowers the cost of living.

And finally the Islamic view towards the role of women is one of the nurturer and educator of the children and not of a provider for the family and in particular not one of contributing to the economic growth of the state. On the contrary, Islam obliges the men of the family and the state to provide for the financial, material needs of the woman. Islam does permit women to gain employment but not within jobs that oppress and exploit her, nor force her to compromise her important duties as a mother and home-maker. However, a healthy, prosperous economy that generates plenty of good quality employment opportunities and hence enables men to effectively provide for their families, without the need for their wives, daughters, and mothers to aid them as bread-winners can only be guaranteed and delivered through the full implementation of the laws of Allah (swt), including the sound Islamic system and policies, under the ruling of the Khilafah "Caliphate" state. Allah (swt) says,

((أَفَمَن أَسَّسَ بُنيـٰنَهُ عَلىٰ تَقوىٰ مِنَ اللَّهِ وَرِ‌ضو‌ٰنٍ خَيرٌ‌ أَم مَن أَسَّسَ بُنيـٰنَهُ عَلىٰ شَفا جُرُ‌فٍ هارٍ‌ فَانهارَ‌ بِهِ فى نارِ‌ جَهَنَّمَ ۗ وَاللَّهُ لا يَهدِى القَومَ الظّـٰلِمينَ))

""Which then is best? - He who laid the foundation of his building on piety to Allah and His good Pleasure? Or he who laid the foundation of his building on the edge of a bank ready to crumble to pieces, so that it crumbled to pieces with him into the Fire of Hell. And Allah guides not the people who are the wrongdoers." [TMQ At-Tauba: 109]

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Umm Khalid

Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

[1] Turkey: Expanding Opportunities for the Next Generation- A Report on Life Chances, February 2010, World Bank

[2] World Bank, Female Labor Force Participation in Turkey; 29.11.2012

[3] Turkey: Increasing Female Employment, World Bank

[4] http://www.indexmundi.com/turkey/population_below_poverty_line.html

[5] http://www.tepav.org.tr/tr/haberler/s/3566

[6] http://www.gazetekamu.com/2013-2-donem-asgari-ucret-rakamlari.html

[7] "Family, Work and Social Gender in Turkey; http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/en/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Aile-2012-ISSP-Family-Survey-final.pdf

I find this allegation the strangest one with regards to the hijab in the West. It reminds me of a newspaper headline I responded to some years ago when the deputy editor of the Times wrote about how ‘Muslim men can't control their urges'.

When addressing this allegation with non-Muslim neighbours, colleagues, I think the question we need to simply ask, is again look at the society around us, what is it that has made the woman the object for desires? Is it a couple of yards of cotton cloth wrapped around a Muslim woman? Or is it a society where lap dancing clubs, men's magazines, page 3 girls, celebrities with perfect figures wearing close to nothing, pornography, an advertising industry that uses a half naked woman to sell tickets to the motor show? It is more than clear that it is within free, secular liberal society women have been reduced on every sphere to something you gawp at and just use for that purpose.

To the point that even young girls are conscious about how beautiful they should look. It is a society, steeped in this view of the woman, which dominates, which now looks at the Muslim woman as someone who is sexualised!

The message of the hijab is anything but sexualisation - actually the opposite is the case. It is only because we live in a society where the man and woman relationship is only viewed this way, which sees everything through this view, which makes them assume that Muslim men must also see their women in this way - They just cannot see it any other way! When in reality, it is one in ten western women in Britain who experience some form of sexual assault.

And even this idea that Muslim women are sexualised has its root in the misconceptions the West always had about the Muslim world. When the Orients looked at the Muslim world centuries ago, it was they who began to write about women in this way. Just because they could not access them as easily, and they were somewhat ‘mystic' all these images were conjured about women of the Muslim world, being chained to harems and being concubines hidden away.

The opposite accusation, that the hijab makes the woman ashamed of her sexuality, is just as ludicrous. How can the woman who seeks to take charge of her sexuality and be in total control of who can exploit her femininity by covering herself up, be the woman who is ashamed of herself? Rather the truth is it is the Muslim woman who has regained control of how people view her, unlike many women in the West who have allowed their external self to become everyone's business. And furthermore, this idea of the woman being blameworthy for the downfall of man, through her tempting and therefore her sexuality, actually has its roots in Christianity. From Eve enticing Adam with the apple - This is not the Islamic view. The woman and her femininity is not a source of shame in Islam.

Rather the Islamic dresscode, the hijab, is one law within a comprehensive social system which seeks to honour women. Hijab actually takes the external appearance of the woman out of society, so that she can be valued in society for her character and contributions - Not the way she looks. Muslim men in work, public life can value her for who she is, in line with the Islamic view of women being an honour.
Therefore, we must be proactive in dispelling such myths about Islam and the Islamic dresscode.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Umm Abdullah Khan
Women's Media Representative Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain