Monday, 14 Dhu al-Qi'dah 1446 | 2025/05/12
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

The Answer to the Question: Regarding the Difference between Al-Kutla (structure) or At-Takatul (structuring) and the Ideological Party To: Abu Yala Natshe

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Question:

Assalamu Alaikum

We are missing you, I hope that we are shaded by the crest of the Khilafah "Caliphate" soon insha'Allah.

I have a question: What is the difference between Al-Kutla (structure) or At-Takatul (structuring) and the ideological party?

Answer:

Wa Alaikum Assalam Wa Rahmatulahi Wa Barakatuhu

1.    Al-Kutla (structure) and At-Takatul (structuring) do not differ in terms of a definition of a group of people that are bonded together by a specific bond to achieve a specific objective. It is permissible to call the gathering a Kutla (structure) and it is permissible to call it Takatul (structuring).

 

2.    The phrase "At-Takatul" is stronger in terms of the meaning than the term "Al-Kutla" and it gives the sense of activity more than the phrase "Kutla", due to the increase in the construction is an increase in meaning. The phrase "At-Takatul" is more suitable for a large gathering that in motion, more so than the phrase "Kutla".

 

3.    As for the ideological party, it depends upon what is adopted by "At-Takatul". If built upon an ideology i.e. a creed from which a system emanates, then it is an ideological party. It will be a correct ideological party if its creed and the system that emanates from it are correct. And it will be an incorrect and misguided ideological party if its creed and the system that emanates from it are wrong and deviating.

 

Your brother,

Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah

 

Link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook Page:

Read more...

News & Comment Egypt and Syria: Tricky Debate with Brother from the Muslim Brotherhood

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

A Muslim audience in Derby, a small town in the middle of England, wanted to ask questions to a panel regarding the situation in Egypt and Syria; what is the stance of Hizb ut Tahrir regarding the Syria uprising? Is the idea of seeking nusrah realistic? What lessons can be learnt from the removal of Dr Morsi? Is democracy the way forward after the removal of Dr Morsi? Has political Islam failed in Egypt? So they invited me, Yahya Nisbet (a convert who had been unjustly jailed in Egypt during Mubarak's time for belonging to a group calling for the Khilafah "Caliphate") and an Egyptian doctor from the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Comment:

I knew that such an audience would ask very pointed questions to us all including our brother from the Muslim Brotherhood and indeed one of the first questions to our brother from the Muslim Brotherhood was along the lines of whether there were failures and mistakes during the rule of Dr Morsi and what lessons could be learnt.

The doctor acknowledged that some mistakes had occurred but then also made points regarding the opposition Dr Morsi faced, the well planned nature of the coup and the fact that everything could not be made Islamic overnight. He argued for a gradualist approach as is the well known approach of our brothers in the Muslim Brotherhood citing the words of our Prophet (saw) regarding Hilf al-Fudl and other matters. This approach and evidences were not fundamentally new to me as we have encountered them over the years. Sensing the audience in Derby, I felt that there was a challenge for us. On one hand, how to get the audience to appreciate that some mistakes had been made by Dr Morsi's government and for us all to learn from those as we go forward, whilst also ensuring that they are absolutely clear that the coup by Sisi could not be supported in any way and that the killing of Muslims who opposed his U.S. backed coup is a red line and haram from Shariah - no matter what one's view is of the approach or mistakes made by Dr Morsi's government. And all these points had to be made whilst recognising that many in the Muslim Brotherhood had sacrificed their lives and had been martyred in Raba Al-Adawwiyyah and Nasr City.

As the questions flowed, the three of us on the panel agreed on many points regarding Egypt and Syria but in terms of the way forward, we had a big disagreement on the continued call for ‘democracy' in Egypt - by some of our brothers in the Muslim Brotherhood.  Someone in the room questioned whether democracy could be a way to bring Islam. The brother from the Muslim Brotherhood mentioned that what was important is the meaning of things - that we should not get stuck on the terms. Brother Yahya said we should avoid the term ‘democracy' as it is inaccurate and contradicts Islam and just further confuses people.

This got me thinking about what we have encountered in other countries when some Muslims use the word ‘democracy'. Some say democracy when what they mean is the right to have elections to choose the ruler as opposed to a ruler being imposed on them as happened with Mubarak, Gadaffi, Al-Saud and others. Others know that the true reality of ‘democracy' is more than having elections to elect a ruler and includes having a body such as a parliament or senate that legislates laws by which society is run. Such legislation contradicts the Islamic Shariah in the sense that Allah (swt) is the Legislator and the Muslim ruler (Khaleefah) is meant to extract the appropriate ruling for different situations and apply them. So we ended up exploring what exactly was meant when people use the word ‘democracy' with regards to Egypt and I explained that while I was opposed to Sisi's coup, I was also opposed to calls for Dr Morsi to be brought back to preside over a ‘democratic' system. Instead of calling for democracy, we should call for the Islamic Khilafah "Caliphate" system, which says the Ummah should appoint her rulers. We, the Islamic activists from which ever group, now need to call for the Khilafah "Caliphate" system, and explain it to the Ummah so they support it with awareness and conviction that this is what is mandated by Allah (swt) and this is the only system that can address the many problems people face in the Muslim world so that when this current coup fails, the Ummah can once again turn to that which she believes in and which is from Her Lord (swt).

Whilst we on the panel had some points of disagreement, we had many points of agreement and this was one of the most fruitful debates I have ever had in dawah. Why? I believe that one of the main factors was that the panel and audience disagreed in an atmosphere of Islamic Brotherhood. The manners and etiquette of the doctor from the Muslim Brotherhood was extremely Islamic so though we argued and debated, you felt this was done sincerely, sensitively, in an open minded way and seeking the good for our Ummah in Syria and Egypt.

May Allah (swt) reward the organisers of the event, the doctor from the Muslim Brotherhood and my brother Yahya Nisbet and may we continue to have such frank interactions as a way to raise awareness about the Khilafah "Caliphate" system.

 

Written for Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Taji Mustafa

Media Representative of Hizb ut Tahrir in Britain

Read more...

Increase in Fuel Prices Another Step to Crush Ordinary People and Produce More Poor (Translated)

The rulers of Sudan are not satisfied with the current status of poverty, hunger and grinding price hikes to which they have led the people. They - who are free from the concept of caring for people's affairs - have turned on us with the decisions to increase fuel prices under the pretext of lifting subsidies, increasing the price of a gallon of gas by 66%, and the price of a gallon of gasoline by 73%, and a cylinder of cooking gas by 67%. They did this with justifications such as: This support leaves the rich rather than the poor, and fuel is being smuggled to neighboring countries...!

We in Hizb ut Tahrir / Wilayah Sudan explain to our people in Sudan the following facts:

First: The increase in fuel prices is in complete compliance with the resolutions of the International Monetary Fund that dictated such decision to the Minister of Finance in the meeting held in May 2013. The International Monetary Fund ordered to gradually lift fuel subsidies to the stage of full liberalization. Note that the Minister of Finance said on 12/03/2012 that "the budget for the year 2013 will not see any lifting of support for petroleum products or the imposition of new taxes or customs" (Sudan Tribune). Yet what does the government of Sudan do? This docile slave to the Kaffir West!

Second: The government itself is responsible for the existence of a deficit in its budget, not the ordinary citizen whom the government burdens with the brunt of its evil. It has separated the South for the benefit of the Kaffir West, causing people to lose 75% of oil and wealth, which went to the south.

Third: Oil is considered by the Islamic Shariah to be public properties, it is not from the state properties to be sold to the own people at the global price. At-Tirmidhi narrated from Abyad Bin Hammal Al-Mazani:

أنه وفَدَ إلى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فاستقطعه الملح فقطع له، فلمّا أن ولّى قال رجل من المجلس: أتدري ما قطعت له؟ إنما قطعت له الماء العدّ. قال: فانتزعه منه

"He sent a delegation to the Messenger of Allah (saw), who cut him off from salt. When he had found protection a man from the council asked: "Do you know from what you cut him off? You cut him off from counted water." He said: "Lift it from him."

The fact that the Messenger of Allah (saw) recovered Abyad Bin Hammal from what he gave him of salt, after he knew that it was a great unceasing amount, is evidence that metal resources which do not cease shall not be owned privately, because it is the property of Muslims in general. Therefore it is the state's duty to distribute these fuels (petrol, gasoline and gas), and other petroleum derivatives to members of the public, either individually or through services after deducting the costs.

Fourth: Sudan produces 130,000 barrels a day and consumes about 100,000 barrels. The Minister of Finances said: "The production of the country amounts to 130,000 barrels per day, and because it has partners, its share amounts to 26 million barrels per year." (As-Sahafa, 09/09/2013). According to figures recognized by the Minister the pure share of Sudan is 71,000 barrels per day, which are the property of the people in the State and not the government, taking into account that the oil contracts with foreign companies have been signed by this government. These contracts are void under the Islamic Shariah. They enabled these companies to loot about 60,000 barrels per day from the Ummah's wealth. A production of 130,000 barrels per day is enough and beyond in covering the country's need. This is another crime committed by the government, and they want the ordinary people to cover up for it!!

Fifth: The government practices fraud and treachery, including its concealing of the contracts for oil extraction and their marketing. The Minister of Finances said: "It is expected that the oil production reaches 150 thousand barrels per day, with revenues worth $300 million" (As-Sahafa, 12/04/2012). Indeed when the government was bargaining for a secession of the south, it reported that its production reached 118,000 barrels per day, and that the consumption amounted to 100,000 barrels per day, therefore Sudan would not be affected by the secession of the south. We wonder for the whereabouts of the petroleum export fees of the South - outside the budget - amounting to $236 million in about three months.  It is narrated from Mu'qal Bin Yasar who said:

سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول: «ما من وال يلي رعية من المسلمين فيموت وهو غاش لهم إلا حرَّم الله عليه الجنة قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم:لكل غادر لواء يوم القيامة يرفع له بقدر غدره ألا ولا غادر أعظم غدراً من أمير عامة

"I heard the Messenger of Allah (saw) say: "There is no Imam responsible for a parish of Muslims who dies having cheated them, but Allah forbids him Paradise." The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: "For every traitor there is a banner lifted on the day of resurrection according to the degree of his treachery. There is no greater treachery than that of the Ameer of the public."


Sixth: The government's talk about the subsidy leaving the rich rather than the poor takes the people for a fool, because deportation affects the prices of goods consumed by the rich and the poor. The capitalist system applied by the government is a system that crushes ordinary people, and produces poverty and the poor. All taxes and customs that are levied on goods and services are paid by the poor. The rich obtain them in favor of the government, so it should not be for those who apply the greedy rules of capitalism to talk about poverty and the poor!!


Oh people of Sudan: Our silence on the application of the capitalist systems of injustice has emboldened our rulers over us, to the point of provocation even despising us! They do not even mind crushing our living conditions. If we want security in our living, safety in our Deen and deliverance in our Hereafter, then we have to return to Allah. We have to abandon these unjust systems and establish in its place the system of Islam under the rightly guided Khilafah "Caliphate", which scatters wheat on mountain tops, so that it cannot be said that a bird remained hungry in the Muslims lands.

Read more...

News & Comment Rejection of Obama's Visit Should Not Just Arise from Economic Reasons

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

The last US president to visit Malaysia was Lyndon Johnson back in 1966. Now, Malaysia is again opening its arms to the president of the US, this time in the guise of Barack Hussein Obama. This 44th president of America is coming to Kuala Lumpur on the 11th of October 2013 to participate in the Global Entrepreneurship Summit, an initiative that the US leader designed as a way to reach out to the Islamic world. There are mixed responses concerning his visit here to Malaysia. Naturally, the government is instrumental in denying that Obama's visit is related to the signing of the TPPA (Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement) which is claimed to be beneficial to Malaysia. On the other hand various local NGOs have already begun issuing statements rejecting Obama's visit. Most of these disagreements are connected to Obama's instrumental role in marketing the idea of TPPA which is seen to be an American imperialist move to dominate countries like Malaysia.

 

Comment:

As Muslims, our rejection of Obama should not just arise from economic reasons. We should reject Obama because he is the personification of the American imperialist policy. In fact, rejecting him is a matter of Aqeedah. As the president of the US, he is responsible for all the crimes being carried out by this Kuffar state all over the Islamic world. It is unfortunate that there are Muslims who have been deceived with Obama's ‘non aggressive' nature and statements such as ‘America is not and will never be at war with Islam'. Nevertheless, in reality, his actions only manifest the extension of American imperialist policies as had been executed by his predecessors. Since the very first day Obama held the presidential post, until today, in his second term as the president of US, Obama has consistently implemented US's colonialist policies and has perpetually waged war on Muslims in the name of ‘war on terrorism'. These are among the policies that he implemented to the detriment of Muslims and Islam as an ideology:

  • Despite knowing Islam's position on Israel and the occupation of Palestine, Obama has continually supported the state of Israel. America never made the move to account Israel even though the world has repeatedly witnessed the atrocities perpetrated by this illegal state. Worse, he continued the American policy of financially supporting the Israeli military.

 

  • It is the American imperialist policy that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of Muslims being killed during the American invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama, continuing this policy, has incessantly been waging war on Islam in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. Despite the apparent withdrawal of US military from Iraq and Afghanistan, a considerable number of military personnel are still left behind to guard American interests there. In Pakistan, Obama has been using drones to carry out attacks on Muslims with the justification of waging war on terrorists. And he continuously carries out these attacks unilaterally in Pakistan and Afghanistan. To date, the Obama administration used drones 5 times more compared to what the Bush administration had used in three years.

 

  • Obama personifies American policies on Syria where the US has been giving all the time and opportunity for Bashar to slaughter Muslims and until now, with all the fuss on chemical weapons, while buying time to find Bashar's replacement, Muslims are still killed on a daily basis. America under Obama will never let Syria, one of the pillars of American hegemony in the Middle East, to be handed over to sincere Muslims fighting to establish Islam.

 

  • Egypt, the base from which America began to extend its influence all over the Middle East is too valuable to be handed over even to the ‘Islamists'. The Obama administration has been instrumental in the spilling of Muslim blood in Egypt and in consolidating the secular military regime of Egypt.

These are just the tip of the iceberg as far as the perpetration by the Obama administration against Islam and Muslims are concerned. Any effort to extend American hegemony over Muslims must be rejected outright, including any of Obama's visit to any Muslim countries. It is the responsibility of Muslims to express this rejection as a matter of Aqeedah and as a matter of honour for Islam and the Muslim Ummah.

 

Written for The Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Dr. Muhammad / Malaysia

Read more...

Britain: Women's March in Support of the Women and Children of al-Sham

  • Published in Video
  •   |  

Hizb ut Tahrir/ Britain will organize a large demonstration in support of the women, children, and elderly of al- Sham; who at the hands of the butcher, criminal, and tyrant Bashar; the enemy of Allah and his Messenger (saw) has massacred their blood.  The demonstration will be held from Edgware Road in London, ending in front of the Syrian Embassy on Sunday,  September 22, 2013.


Picture Slideshow: Click Here

 


 

Speech by Dr. Nazreen Nawaz in the Women's March for the Sake of Syria

 

 

Speech by Sister Shohana in the Women's March for the Sake of Syria

 

 

 

 


Press Release

Over a Thousand Attend the Women's March in London

to Condemn the Massacres of Women and Children in Syria and to Support their Struggle for Islamic Rule

 

Press Release

Hizb ut Tahrir to Hold a Vital Women's March in the UK to Raise the Plight and Struggle of the Women and Children of Syria

 

 

Press Release


Hundreds of Women to Attend UK Women's March in Support of the Women and Children of Syria


 

Press Coverage of the March

 


 

Invitation from the Women Members of Hizb ut Tahrir in a march in London

in support of our sisters in al-Sham

 

 

 

Launch Video by Dr. Nazreen Nawaz of Support for the Women's March

 

 

 

Message from the Children and Women of Syria to Awaken the Ummah for their Support

 

 

 

 

Message by Sister Umm Khalid  of Support for the Women's March

 

 

 

 

Speech by Sister Om Sohayb Alshami  in Support of the Women's March for al-Sham

 

 

 

Invitation from Bara'a Manasra  in Support of the Women's March for al-Sham

 

 

 

Message by Sister Um Yahya Mohammed in Support of the Women's March for al-Sham

 

 

Invitation from Umm Awab to the Women's March in Support for al-Sham

 

 

 

 

Invitation from Umm Musab to the Women's March in Support for al-Sham

 

 

 

 

 

Sisters in Hizb ut Tahrir Wilayah Pakistan in Solidarity with the March of Support for the Women and Children of al-Sham

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Invitation from Sister Fika Komora to the Women's March in Support for al-Sham

 

 

 

Read more...

Mosque Demolished and Imam Imprisoned

24 September in Peace court of Moscow district of Kazan, imam of Al-Ikhlas Mosque Rustem Safin was sentenced. Safin was sentenced to two years imprisonment in colony of general regime under Part 1 of Art. 282.2 CC RF namely on charges of active dissemination of Hizb ut Tahrir education.

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands