Friday, 18 Dhu al-Qi'dah 1446 | 2025/05/16
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

Bribery in Afghan Government Departments is the Legacy of Democratic System

The issue of widespread corruption in Afghan departments has been acknowledged both by the government of Afghanistan and Western colonialists, so much so that after the flight of former head of the Central Bank of Afghanistan to USA, President Hamed Karzai said, "Officials with two nationalities do whatever they wish and then fly to foreign countries such as Washington, London, Paris and other places."

Read more...

The Garment that Subjugated Women in History, is Embraced Once Again

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

The infamous Victorian corset of the 19th century became a sign of the woman's subjugated state. That in order to appear appealing to men she had to clad a garment that reshifted her organs and contracted her lungs to such an extent that it was known that many women actually passed out. But health and well being in the Victorian era, was secondary to the mould women had to fit.

Today in the 21st century we would believe such garments to be only a figment of history and now the imagination! However there has been a reported rise of the post-baby girdle amongst women after they have their baby, particularly after American actress Jessica Alba admitted wearing one after each time she gave birth to her two children. She said, "It was brutal..... But worth it."

There are a variety of brands which sell such a product now, as women rush to embrace a garment of agony, virtually hours after experiencing the agony of childbirth. Although many of the women argue it helped their stomach muscles contract and had health benefits, there are no proven ones as Dr Edward R. Laskowski, specialist in sports medicine, recently said that it just "temporarily compress and redistribute fat and skin around the abdomen."

The fact that a discussion is now ensuing in the beauty world about girdles being an option to regain one's former figure, when such a garment was labelled and sealed as oppressive over a century ago, highlights the absolute failure of the feminist struggle in the West. Because feminism erupted seeking to smash the shackles of expectations and moulds which degraded women, reducing them to objects to look pretty. However here we are a century or more later, still discussing how enduring pain to be perceived as beautiful by men and society, is acceptable and even praised.

This is because although women under feminism woke up in the West and started to fight for their rights, what they did not realise was the system had not been woken up. The system was still the Capitalist system which always put making money over the well being and value of people. So as women fought to be just like men, in order to be treated the same as men and enter the workplace, Capitalism supported this because it would make money. Women working would make more revenue and GDP. As women fought to have the freedom to dress how they wanted, and behave how they wanted, Capitalism supported this and pushed her to do this, by making money out of sexualising her in everything from the media to advertising so men would buy. It was never about the woman's struggle, rather about revenue.

It is this system which never cared for the rights of women and never owed anything to the well being of women, which now continues to damage the lives of women. It does not care how far women have come whether it has been a century or a day; it only cares that women can still be made to feel terrible about their physical appearance so they will then purchase make-up to girdles, to feel better. It cares only that if the image of the physically beautiful woman is perpetuated in public, men will continue to be interested and buy into it.

Women must understand that taking on a battle for rights and value will never come to anything under a system which will never care. If they want real rights and value to be enshrined and prioritised whatever happens, the only alternative is Islam.

The rights of any group of people - man, woman, non-Muslim, Muslim can never be changed according to any perceived benefits or losses under Islam as it is the rule of Allah (swt) which has been defined by Him and set by Him. And the ruler in Islam is then accountable to Allah (swt) in how he executes the rule of Allah. Thus the viewpoint of the woman is always defined by hadith such as this where Muhammad (saw) said:

"الدنيا متاع وخير متاعها المرأة الصالحة "

"The world and all things in it are precious but the most precious thing is a virtuous woman" (Muslim)

Ensuring that the value of the woman through her character and virtues, always remains as the value that society judges her by.

((وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ تِبْيَانًا لِّكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً وَبُشْرَىٰ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ))

"We have revealed the Book to you explaining clearly everything, and a guidance and mercy and good news for those who submit."
[TMQ 16:89]

 


Umm Abdullah Khan
Women's Media Representative Britain

 

Read more...

Women's Seminar: "Hasten to Establish the Khilafah to Protect the Honourable Women of Al-Sham"

  • Published in Video
  •   |  

An interview with Dr. Nazreen Nawaz, Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir regarding the issues surrounding the Jordanian authorities forcefully banning of the conference and the content of the event itself.

 

 

 


 

To read the scheduled opening speech of the Ameer Of Hizb ut Tahrir

Scholar and Sheikh Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah

for Jordan's Women's Seminar April, 2013

but was banned by the Jordanian security forces which was then replaced with by a women's protest,

Click Here


 

 

********************************************

 

HT Women's Seminar:

Establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" to Protect the Women of Al-Sham

 

 

*******************************************


Hizb ut Tahrir Women's Seminar: Establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" to Protect the Women of Al-Sham

 

 

********************************************

 

Hizb ut Tahrir Women's Seminar:
"Hasten to Establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" to Protect the Honourable Women of Al-Sham"

Hizb ut Tahrir, led by the eminent scholar, skilled politician, and prominent thinker Ameer of Hizb ut Tahrir Sheikh Ata Ibn Khaleel Abu ArRashtah has launched an important campaign for women entitled, "Hasten to Establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" to Protect the Honourable Women of Al-Sham" to address the heart-breaking plight of women and children in Syria under the brutal rule of the tyrant Bashar Al-Assad and his Kufr Baathist regime, and to bring forth a solution to swiftly end this massacre undertaken by the criminal Assad. It will also highlight that it is only through the urgent establishment of the Khilafah "Caliphate" system based purely upon Islam that their blood and dignity can be protected.

It will also raise a call to Muslims globally to hasten their efforts to swiftly establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" as well as a heartfelt appeal to the sons of the Muslim armies of their great Islamic responsibility to defend the blood of their sisters in Syria without delay and to give the Nusrah (material support) to Hizb ut Tahrir for the establishment of the noble State which care of the Ummah in the entire region under the system of Allah (subhanahu wa taala).

The campaign will lead up to a high-profile women's seminar on the issue on the 27th of April 2013 in Amman, Jordan. This video highlights the key points to be addressed in this vital campaign and seminar.

 

 

*******************************************

 

Interview with a Dawah Carrier regarding the Women's Seminar
which will be held in Amman - Jordan

17 Jumada II 1434 AH corresponding to 27 April 2013

Hizb ut Tahrir Organises a Critical Women's Seminar:
"Hasten to Establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" to Protect the Honourable Women of Al-Sham"

 

 

********************************************

 

ندوة نساء حزب التحرير: "سارعوا لإقامة الخلافة حماية لحرائر الشام"

 

 

********************************************

 

To read the Press Release from the Central Media Office:

Hizb ut Tahrir Organises a Critical Women's Seminar:
"Hasten to Establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" to Protect the Honourable Women of Al-Sham"

Click Here

 

********************************************

 

 

Read more...

Headline News 01/05/2013

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  


Headlines:


• US Wants 20,000 Troops Arriving in Jordan
• Obama Voices Syria Chemical Weapons Concern to Putin
• Britain Reverses East of Suez Policy with Return to Military Bases in Gulf
• CIA Bribes Karzai: Millions in 'Ghost Money' Paid to Afghanistan President's Office

 

 

Details:


US Wants 20,000 Troops Arriving in Jordan


The Pentagon plans to relocate an effective military force beginning with 200 then up to 20 000 soldiers and station them in Jordan in order to be prepared for a possible military intervention in Syria. The first contingent, comprising 200 soldiers and to be sent from the 1st Armored Division from Fort Bliss, Texas, will be sent to Jordan to establish a "small headquarters" near the Jordanian border with Syria and plotting "possible military operations including rapid buildup of U.S. forces if the White House decides that a military intervention is necessary," the Los Angeles Times said citing government sources in the country. According to the source, this decision is the first step towards a possible involvement of Washington in the military conflict in Syria. The first contingent of the military depart this month to Jordan while "the majority will in May," adds the text. The newspaper says that the Pentagon "has also made plans to expand the force to 20,000 or more, if necessary, including a contingent for special operations carrying equipment to find stockpiles of chemical weapons in Syria," U.S. defense units to protect Jordan's air space and conventional military units able to invade Syria if necessary." The Secretary of Defense of the United States, Chuck Hagel, ordered the movement of troops to Jordan, while making clear that both he and President Obama remain "deeply concerned to launch a military intervention in Syria." On the same day, the Chief of Joint Staff of the U.S. Army, General Martin Dempsey, warned that sending U.S. troops to Syria could have "unintended consequences" that could worsen the situation. However, in autumn 2012, Dempsey supported military intervention in Syria by the United States, along with the then director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), David Petraeus, the former Pentagon chief Leon Panetta and former Secretary of State of the country, Hillary Clinton.

 


Obama Voices Syria Chemical Weapons Concern to Putin


US President Barack Obama has voiced concern to his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin about reports that Syria has used chemical weapons. In a phone conversation, the two leaders agreed to stay in touch on the issue, tasking their foreign ministers to hold further talks. The US earlier said it had "varying degrees of confidence" that chemical weapons had been used in Syria. The government in Damascus has denounced the claims as "lies". In a statement, the White House said on Monday that Mr Obama and Mr Putin talked on the phone on Monday, with the US leader "underscoring his concern over Syrian chemical weapons". Washington has repeatedly criticised Russia - along with China - for blocking tougher action against Syria in the UN Security Council, including new sanctions. Mr Putin and Mr Obama are scheduled to hold a face-to-face talks in June. Mr Obama last week promised a "vigorous investigation" into the issue. He warned that it would be a "game changer" for US policy if the reports about chemical weapons were to be proved true. Both the US and UK have pointed to emerging evidence that Syria has used weapons such as the nerve gas sarin. The Syrian government has dismissed claims that its forces have used chemical weapons, saying that the Western accusations "do not have any credibility". More than 70,000 people have been killed since fighting between Syrian forces and rebels erupted in March 2011.

 


Britain Reverses East of Suez Policy with Return to Military Bases in Gulf


Britain plans to restore a permanent military presence in the Gulf, basing land, air and naval forces in the region, according to a defence think tank with close ties to the armed forces. The withdrawal of all British troops from Afghanistan next year will create a unique opportunity to reverse the "East of Suez" decision that formed a landmark in Britain's retreat from imperial power, the Royal United Services Institute will say in a paper to be published today. Harold Wilson's government decided in 1968 to close a string of military bases in the Gulf, which had served as a linchpin of Empire for more than a century. The British withdrawal was completed in 1971, allowing the Gulf States to become independent. The think tank will say the Armed Forces are considering a partial reversal of the "East of Suez" decision. "The military intends to build up a strong shadow presence around the Gulf; not an evident imperial-style footprint, but a smart presence," writes Professor Michael Clarke, its director. "This may not yet be declared government policy," he writes. "But the UK appears to be approaching a decision point where a significant strategic reorientation of its defence and security towards the Gulf is both plausible and logical." Any new British presence would be focused on the United Arab Emirates, where the RAF is planning to use al-Minhad airbase, according to the think tank. The Royal Navy has always kept three minesweepers and at least one frigate or destroyer in the Gulf, supported by a small permanent staff in Bahrain. The paper suggests this flotilla could be reinforced. The Army plans to use its links with Oman's armed forces to base troops in the country. This would allow the use of "thousands of square miles of challenging terrain ideally suited to the training of military units in the skills of desert warfare". Moving equipment and personnel from Afghanistan to the Gulf would be cheaper than bringing them back to Britain, says the paper. In addition, Britain's commercial links with the Gulf are increasingly important. About 100,000 British citizens live in the UAE, with trade between the two countries of £14 billion last year. Qatar is now Britain's biggest source of liquefied natural gas. Any deployment would also create a showcase for military equipment, it adds. Two assumptions lay behind the "East of Suez" decision: the oil price, then $4 per barrel, would stay at that level, and Iran, then under the Shah, would remain a reliable ally. The demise of both certainties and the ever-increasing wealth of the Gulf help explain why, if the institute's paper is correct, that decision is being quietly reviewed.

 


CIA Bribes Karzai: Millions In 'Ghost Money' Paid To Afghanistan President's Office


Tens of millions of U.S. dollars in cash were delivered by the CIA in suitcases, backpacks and plastic shopping bags to the office of Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai for more than a decade, the New York Times says, citing current and former advisers to the Afghan leader. The so-called "ghost money" was meant to buy influence for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) but instead fuelled corruption and empowered warlords, undermining Washington's exit strategy from Afghanistan, the newspaper quoted U.S. officials as saying. "The biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan", one American official said, "was the United States." The CIA declined to comment on the report and the U.S. State Department did not immediately comment. The New York Times did not publish any comment from Karzai or his office. "We called it 'ghost money'," Khalil Roman, who served as Karzai's chief of staff from 2002 until 2005, told the New York Times. "It came in secret and it left in secret." In response to the report, Karzai told reporters in Helsinki after a meeting with Finnish leaders that the office of the National Security Council had been receiving support from the U.S. government for the past 10 years. He said the amounts had been "not big" and the funds were used for various purposes including assistance for the wounded. "It's multi-purpose assistance," he said, without commenting on the report's claims the funds fuelled corruption and empowered warlords. U.S. and Afghan officials familiar with the payments were quoted as saying that the main goal in providing the cash was to maintain access to Karzai and his inner circle and to guarantee the CIA's influence at the presidential palace, which wields tremendous power in Afghanistan's highly centralised government. Much of the money went to warlords and politicians, many with ties to the drug trade and in some cases the Taliban, The New York Times said. U.S. and Afghan officials were quoted as saying the CIA supported the same patronage networks that U.S. diplomats and law enforcement agents struggled to dismantle, leaving the government in the grip of organised crime.

 


Abu Hashim

 

 

Read more...

Result of the Strategic Pact (The House of the Spider)

Karzai's chief of staff, Abdul Karim Khurram said on April 28 that NATO forces provided enough space and opportunity to the Pakistan forces, so they could continue building the door and other security installations. For this reason, Karzai sent a letter to his master President Barrack Obama to take this issue seriously and force Pakistan to withdraw, based on the strategic pact signed between the two states.

Read more...

Betrayal of the Muslims of Ash-Sham Zardari Shakes the Bloodied Hands of the Syrian Regime

Hizb ut Tahrir / Wilayah Pakistan denounces the meeting on Tuesday 29 April of President Zardari with representative of the tyrant of Ash-Sham, Bashar, in which a letter from Bashar was conveyed to Zardari. The crimes of Bashar against his own people demanded the tearing up of his letter and throwing out his messenger, or not even allowing him to enter Pakistan in the first place.

Read more...

Question & Answer Where is the situation in Korea heading?

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Question:

North Korean news agency, Yonhap, reported on the 21st of April 2013 that both the South Korean Chief of Staff Gen. Jung Seung-Jo and his U.S. counterpart General Martin Dempsey have threatened North Korea to be wary of its on-going threats as it will lead to severe consequences. On the same day, the above-mentioned source stated a high-level government source has announced that the South Korean military has monitored a launch of missile platforms mobile units, suspected of carrying Scud missiles in the east coast of North Korea. North Korea has deployed 7 mobile platforms to launch missiles, including a special platform for the Musudan mid-range missile on the east coast; and with the deployment of two additional platforms, the number of missiles in the region has reached 9 missiles...

Reuters had reported prior to this, on Thursday 18/4/2013, that North Korea has offered a series of conditions to the U.S. and South Korea if they wished to hold dialogues, including the abolition of sanctions imposed by the United Nations because of its nuclear and missile tests, as a likely indication to end weeks of war vows that overshadowed the Korean peninsula.

It also mentioned that the National Defense Commission in North Korea, the highest military body in the country, issued a statement stating that making the Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons will begin when the United States withdraws its nuclear weapons, which Pyongyang says that Washington who brought the weapons to the region...

It is apparent from this that while the statements of a heated war are escalating, so are the statements of dialogue. Therefore where are matters heading? What then are the actual positions of Russia and China? May Allah reward you..

Answer:

In order to understand this issue, we have to review it from its beginning, not on the basis of the latest statements alone, this issue has passed many stages which we will outline first, and then outline the recent developments and the positions of the States:

1. This crisis did not erupt as a result of yesterday's events, but is a frequent one, and it escalates at every nuclear experiment carried out by North Korea. It escalated at the first experiment in the year 2006, as well as at the second one in the year 2009 which was greater than the first. At that time, dated 25/5/2009, North Korea announced that it is not bound to the truce signed between them and America in the year 1953. Now that a third nuclear test has been successfully performed on 12/02/2013, it also announced on 30/03/2013 that it will not comply with the truce, and declared that it is in a state of war. North Korea then began to focus its missiles off the east coast directing them towards Japan and the U.S. base on the island of Guam, which is controlled by America in the Pacific Ocean since 1898 after it defeated Spain which occupied Guam since 1521; in the year 1950, America declared its annexation to its territory, and deemed the population of more than 180 thousand people as part of its population, which is used for military bases for the Army and Navy and includes approximately 6000 of its soldiers. Thus Guam is considered significant because it serves as a line of defense for its territory from the Pacific Ocean side.

 

2. What is new this time is that America was able to provoke North Korea with conducting large maneuvers near North Korea. These maneuvers began on 19/2/2013 and will continue until the end of this month 30/4/2013; these maneuvers are large and unprecedented, coinciding with the sanctions set by America in the Security Council, which were approved by Russia and China on 7/3/2013, after the West and America in particular stirred efficiently North Korea's third experiment on 12/2/2013. These maneuvers created an intense provocation to North Korea, as they were of an unusual nature, which in these maneuvers America introduced advanced types of forces from B-52 aircrafts as well as B-2 that are capable of carrying nuclear bombs, including stealth aircraft and warships carrying a missile system as a way of exhibiting their strength to terrorize North Korea and other countries.

 

3. The sanctions and maneuvers are a continuation of the techniques of evasion and deception, pressure and threat carried out by America in the region. As for the techniques of evasion and deception carried out by America towards North Korea, for example, North Korea has agreed last year in 02/29/2012 to suspend its nuclear program and allowed the return of inspectors, therefore America sent 240 thousand tons of aid to the North during the first nuclear experiment performed after the death of its leader Kim Jong Il and his son Kim Jong-un came to rule. In the process of evasion and deception to stop the aid, America rose and accused the leaders of the North that they kept these aids to themselves and denied the people of it, thereby as a form of humiliation to North Korea portraying them as beggars and that the officials steal these aids. As for the methods of challenge, pressure and threat used by the United States, it announced last year a new strategy in the Asia / Pacific region regarding strengthening its power in this region by transferring 60% of its Navy forces to cope with potential risks until 2020.

All of these methods used by America were to provoke North Korea to behave in a heated manner while in contrast; they are used by America as a justification to expand their bases near China and Russia in the region under the pretext of resisting danger of North Korea. What concerns for America in the first degree is China, and in the subsequent degree, Russia ... and not North Korea, and the expansion of the U.S. presence near China which will face a Chinese reaction, and a lighter Russian reaction. If there were an excuse for America, especially if it perfected its exploitation, it would then be able to expand militarily and even set up a missile shield without causing any hostile fuss.

 

4. This is what has happened, these provocations affected North Korea and thus propelling it to a heated escalation against America and its neighbors South Korea and Japan. On 9/3/2013, North Korea waved once again the outbreak of war in the region when its official agency published a press release saying: "The Korean Peninsula is heading towards a heated-nuclear war." This agency also published on 3/4/2013 a communique to the North Korean forces that mentioned: "The American threats will be destroyed with smaller, lighter and more versatile nuclear weapons," and that the army "had received an approval to strike America with the possibility of using nuclear weapons that are sophisticated and diverse." It also announced the cancellation of the truce between them and America since the year 1953.

Thereafter, North Korea worked on escalating the situation to the maximum, so it demanded from Russia, Britain and other countries to evacuate their embassies from the country; and called on foreigners to leave South Korea if events escalated; and placed mid-range missiles on the platforms launch and concealed them on the east coast in a move that suggests that they threaten Japan and U.S. bases in the Pacific. It responds to the maneuvers and sanctions imposed on it by the United Nations. It also closed the industrial zone in Kaesong Industrial Complex where companies station South North workers and generated an income that exceeded half a billion dollars last year, an area set up by South Korea motivated by North America as a way to contain the North. The establishment of the inter-Korean industrial zone begun in late 2004, in accordance with a plan that initially started in 1998, which includes 123 South Korean companies, and employs nearly 54 thousand workers from North Korea. As a reaction to this tension with the United States and South Korea, North Korea announced on 02/04/2013 the rehabilitation and operation of all installations in the Yongbyon nuclear compound that was stopped in 2007, including a site for uranium enrichment and reactors of power level 5 MW, by doing this, North Korea aims to becoming accepted by America and the world as a country that has become a nuclear state, and has ballistic missiles able to defend itself and to threaten others.

 

5. America then took to exploiting these heated tensions resulting from the fiery statements of North Korea, so it took advantage of it to achieve its objective, which is to accelerate the deployment of the missile shield without causing any confrontation with Russia or China, alluring North Korea to find a justification for America to expand its presence in the region, which makes it seem as though it is doing so in defense of America and its allies, as Kerry said during a visit to South Korea on 12/04/2013.

After the threats of North Korea that it will strike the American bases with medium-range missiles owned by them, America announced as reported by  The New York Times on 04/04/2013 that it "will establish a missile shield on this island to counter medium-range missiles, as well as the deployment of anti-ballistic missiles warships in the waters of the Pacific Ocean; it was scheduled to deploy their missile shield in 2015," the newspaper added: "The decision to accelerate the deployment of a missile defense system came under a series of steps taken by Washington to deter North Korea from carrying out any military action or new missile tests, the decision was taken after only a few hours of the North Korean provocations." The newspaper also added that "spreading the missile shield system in Guam will unleash the warships to become closer to sites near the North Korean seashore." This means that America will station near China, which points to America having benefited from its provocations with North Korea by hastening the spread of the missile shield in the region, and that it set a trap for North Korea so that it could achieve these objectives. As Japan announced its installment of Patriot missiles in the heart of the Capital to face North Korea's missiles and it will allow the installment of the missile system in Okynawa Island which has important American bases. With the fact that Japan had been calling for the expulsion of the Americans from there, and now Americans strengthen their presence with their bombardment of North Korea's threats without anyone's objections.

The Philippines announced its readiness to install this missiles system and strengthen the American presence on its land, although the people in the Philippines demanded an end to the American presence in the country.

 

6. As America was successful in exploiting the escalation of North Korea as a justification to expand the U.S. military presence and the deployment of the missile shield, America returned to its promised Democratic party policy, which is to contain North Korea through using dialogue the American way, i.e. not making the situation as an American-North Korean situation, but one that involves other countries in the region, in particular China, to become responsible for the actions of North Korea ... And this is what they have been doing, through the six-party talks, so the issue appears as if North Korea is facing the other five countries, and not America ...

It is worth mentioning that the Democrats' policy since Bill Clinton that the United States towards North Korea is to resort to negotiations with them, under their policy of containment, which was successful in 1994 when the first agreement was signed with North Korea, but America avoided, in the era of Republicans, particularly in the first period of Bush JR, making North Korea one of the states of the axis of evil. North Korea took a similar approach to what it did before conducting a nuclear test and declaring a non-compliance with the truce at the beginning of the first Obama administration in 2009, however, this administration did not  respond to the North Korea  provocations, but called for the resumption of negotiations and allowed South Korea to continue to work on the rapprochement with the North, for this reason, the Democratic administrations tend to negotiate with North Korea and implementation of the containment policy. The situation differs now, where America wanted to employ this latest event to achieve important strategic goals before entering into negotiations and pursuing the containment process, though this will begin after achieving its objectives that it had planned and still plans for since the announcement of installing the missile shield near the Korean peninsula.

Thus, the statements took a different turn but with conditions ... It is the American game that leads only to diluting the issue and making it spin in circles under the name of the six-party negotiations to ensure respect for North Korea's international commitments. [AFP 04/09/2013] The second in command official at the Pentagon, Ash Carter, said: "The United States is in close contact with China, Russia, South Korea and Japan," and he said that "he believes that China can play a greater role in influencing North Korea to stop its provocations," stressing "that China's influence on North Korea is greater than any other country." U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry mentioned in South Korea before heading to China: "The United States will never accept North Korea as a nuclear power." Stating, "It is up to Beijing to take a tougher stance with North Korea to push it towards abandoning its nuclear program." [Reuters: 12/04/2013] Thus, America wants to make the North Korea issue a regional issue especially with China, and not solely an American issue.

 

7. As for the position of China, it has changed this time from before; it did not support North Korea in its stride. The new Chinese president Ji Jin Ping said: "No country has the right to push Asia into chaos." And he added: "It is not allowed for anyone to push the region, or even the world, into chaos because of their selfishness." Also adding: "We should act in consultation to overcome major difficulties in order to ensure stability in Asia, which is facing new challenges, as long as there are sensitive issues and traditional and non-traditional security threats." [Middle East: 04/07/2013] China's Foreign Minister Wan Bi called for "the need to resolve the crisis through dialogue." (same source) The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei has announced that "the best solution for the North Korean nuclear issue is for all parties to show responsibility." [Reuters: 8/4/2013] China has supported the Security Council resolution to toughen sanctions on North Korea after the latter conducted its third nuclear test. This does not mean that China has abandoned its friend North Korea, but it appears that China believes that the actions of North Korea may harm it and was disturbed by it, because it enhances the U.S. presence in the region and gives America excuses to establish a missile shield in the region as a whole and be directed against it and its missiles, eventually failing its plans of controlling its region.

China announced its regrets for the Pyongyang Declaration to restart the nuclear reactor. The International Atomic Energy Agency said that this declaration is another development, creating great regret and constitutes a flagrant violation of Security Council resolutions. This reactor is the only source for the production of plutonium for North Korea's nuclear program. It is likely that the North has plutonium stocks enough to make 4 or 8 nuclear bombs.

 

8. As for Russia's position, it takes the path as America, disapproving of North Korea's actions. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Ukashevic declared: "We stand in solidarity with them with respect to rejecting the approach of behavioral provocation and belligerent to Pyongyang at the moment." But he added at the same time that "we should not give up on making political and diplomatic efforts, because any country can bring the risk of severe turmoil in Northeast Asia." [Reuters: 09/04/2013] Russia has agreed to tightening sanctions on North Korea in the Security Council after the third experiment two months ago. Russia did not take serious measures towards the U.S. anti-North Korea position, and America's provocation against it by conducting maneuvers with South Korea while engaging its advanced weapons in these maneuvers, Russia therefore did not heed to it neither did they renounce it, knowing that this poses danger for the region and aims to strengthen the U.S. presence in it to terrorize everyone and impose an American dominance on the world. It is directed against Russia itself in a way to disallow it to have any presence in this region. This behavior indicates the poor international political performance of Russia and it minimizes it to a level not worthy of a great state which has its own international interests and competes with the leading state or works on relegating it off this position.

 

9. So that, we can say that America was successful in provoking North Korea through the massive maneuvers conducted near North Korea and through sanctions, which led North Korea to escalating the nuclear threats and war atmosphere, which allowed America to find an excuse to expand its military presence in the region and the deployment of the missile shield.

 

However, the arrogance of America, that is arrogant with its strength makes its goals easily exposed, which allows China to realize the ploys of America's political and expansionist objectives in the region, and all this will make the installment of the missile shield enter into the spiral of the Chinese opposition from anew.

 

 

Read more...

"Ghost Money" The Cost of Tyrant Politicians in Western Markets

New York Times in its latest issue of April 29, stated that for more than a decade, bundles of American dollars packed into suitcases, backpacks and, on occasion, plastic shopping bags have been dropped off every month or so at the offices of Afghanistan's president. They were used for influencing ex-Mujahidin leaders or current democrats.

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands