The question is: The emphasis from the visit is the preferential trade agreement as well as the Syrian file ... Is the intent of the visit the commercial factor or the Syrian file or both? And what is America's role in it?

"This clearly shows that the garment which is worn over one's clothes i.e. the cover (Mula'a) and sheet (Milhafa) - should be draped down towards the floor until it covers the feet", and in his saying: "It is not necessary to cover the feet (by the draping of the garment) if the feet are concealed (by wearing shoes and socks)." How can we understand this issue? Does the woman have…

So to what extent is this compatible with your attack to the tariffs policy of today, in reference to the Hadith of the Prophet (saw: «لا يدخل الجنة صاحب مكس» "The tax-collector will not enter Paradise"? And does domestic trade mean that the state imposes tariffs on trade made between the Wilayat of the Islamic State itself? 

It came in the adoption of the scholar Taqiuddin (may Allah's mercy be upon him), that he refused holding demonstrations ... And now we see demonstrations being widely spread and that you yourselves organizing them. Is there legislative (sharia'h) evidence on your action?