Tuesday, 03 Rajab 1447 | 2025/12/23
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

Ummah's Minbar: The word of truth for Mr. Nabih Aljaiziri, may Allah (swt) protect him    

  • Published in Video
  •   |  

Excerpts from an interview in the Hiwar channel with Colonel Said Musa Maragha known as Abu Moussa, Secretary General of the Central Committee of Fatah Intifada, within the program (Reviews) the fifth of a series, prepared and conducted by Dr. Azzam Tamimi, which dealt with the positions of Mr. Nabih Aljaiziri, may Allah (swt) protect and heal him - inside the Jordanian Armed Forces that shocked them with the words of truth who did not fear but Allah (swt). Those positions that led to his dismissal from the Jordanian army, after a sharp public confrontation in the Prophet Jacob Camp on the outskirts of Jerusalem against the dominance of the British leadership on the Jordanian army, and in the gathering of hundreds of the West Bank officers, in addition to the above, it reveals of his relationship with Hizb ut Tahrir.

 

1430 AH - 2009 CE


 


Disclaimer: "Ummah's Minbar" is a designated channel that airs selected Khilafah "Caliphate" recordings prepared by the people of our Ummah. The recordings are not issued by Hizb ut Tahrir or any of its official sections; rather they are recordings from the people of our Islamic Ummah; which are published on our site to publish the goodness for Islam and Muslims.

Read more...

(رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوا عَنْهُ) "Allah is pleased with them and they with Him"

  • Published in Articles
  •   |  

Imam Muslim narrated in his Sahih, on the authority of Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him), that the Prophet Muhammad (saw) said,


بدأ الإسلام غريبا، وسيعود كما بدأ غريبا، فطوبى للغرباء


"Islam began as a stranger and will return being a stranger as it began, so glad tidings to the strangers."


Indeed, if we look around, the age of today is no different to the one mentioned in the noble sayings of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). The Deen of Islam has became strange; corruption and chaos is everywhere. The Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has been distorted and Islam has been limited within the confines of our mosques, in fact in many cases, even the pulpits of our very mosques are misrepresenting Islam. On the other hand, Colonial Powers together with corrupt Muslim Rulers have waged a war against Islam. Since the last few decades, the latest link of the chain of this war, was first to stain the idea of Jihad and now they are trying to blacken the concept of Khilafah "Caliphate".


But, all praise be to Allah, the feeling of Islam being attacked once again has caused the Muslims to unite and instilled within them motion. Muslims are now trying to revive Islam again and trying to clean the dust that has been accumulated on the Islamic thoughts since the last few centuries. They want to bring the Tree of Islam back to life with all its greenery. Moreover they are on the road to become the best Ummah again, which will cause the ideology of Islam to be dominant over all other ideologies.


However, this task is not easy. On this road, there are difficulties and trials. How can the Kuffar tolerate the re-establishment of the State of Islam? To dismantle which they fought wars and tirelessly conspired against for centuries. Today, whosoever is standing for this call is being silenced and victimized by the Kuffar through their agent rulers in the Muslim World. Therefore, today, whosoever is trying to implement Islam as an Ideology and a System of Governance is be a stranger to this world as mentioned by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).


Today, the Dawah carrier has to prepare himself for the fact that he has to move against the flow of this society. The matters which are insignificant in the sight of Allah have been made significant, rather they have been made the very focus of life. Those matters which are an issue of life and death are deemed inappropriate. This is the very impact of the Capitalist System that has been implemented on the Muslim World since the last few decades. This is the very reason why a Dawah carrier suffers in situations where he finds his friends working day and night, beautifying their careers while the Dawah carrier is spending his/her time on people s/he neither knows nor does he seek any worldly return from. His family members, relatives and loved ones' give him exemplars of those who are leading a successful worldly life, making them models of progress in: how well-settled he is in his life, now he has his own house, a new car and he has arranged so many luxuries for his parents and even managed to take them on a pilgrimage. His friends often ask him, what have you got yourself into? Think about your family and yourself and your future.


Whenever a Dawah carrier hears such comments he feels that the rulings of Islam, its requirements, the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) the way of the Sahabah, all have become strange and a Dawah carrier will feel this strangeness at some phase of Dawah or the other. A Dawah carrier can only protect himself from stumbling from the road of conviction in this strange environment when he would think and contemplate over the life of the Prophets and the Companions and remind himself how these noble personalities considered the worldly luxuries insignificant when compared with the Deen. How at times when they had to choose between Deen and this world, they always gave up on this world and chose the Deen and how the Mujahideen considered the propagation and establishment of Islam as the very purpose of their life.


This is the strangeness for which there is reward, not the reward that will be received by the 'As'haab al-Yameen' but rather it is the reward received by the 'al-Sabiqun al-Awwalun'. It will be received by those who will be beloved of Allah on the Day of Judgement, they will be sitting on the pulpits of light (al-Noor), they will be granted place under the shade of Allah and regarding these Allah has mentioned in Quran;


((لَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ))


"No fear shall come upon them, nor shall they grieve" [Yunus: 62]


Indeed those who are either engulfed by this worldly life or those who are waiting for the day when the Deen of Islam will be dominant and the Khilafah "Caliphate" will be re-established and they would join, no doubt they will not be equal to those who are standing head-on against the waves of Kufr, facing imprisonment at the hands of agent tyrannical rulers and facing their thugs, colliding against the dark laws made by them and working hard for the struggle of the re-establishment of the Khilafah "Caliphate" at the compromise of their wives and children.


A similar situation could be seen at the time of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) when the Arab was observing the conflict between Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), his Companions and the Quraish of Makah. Imam Bukhari narrated that


وَكَانَتِ العَرَبُ تَلَوَّمُ بِإِسْلاَمِهِمُ الفَتْحَ، فَيَقُولُونَ: اتْرُكُوهُ وَقَوْمَهُ، فَإِنَّهُ إِنْ ظَهَرَ عَلَيْهِمْ فَهُوَ نَبِيٌّ صَادِقٌ، فَلَمَّا كَانَتْ وَقْعَةُ أَهْلِ الفَتْحِ، بَادَرَ كُلُّ قَوْمٍ بِإِسْلاَمِهِمْ...


"The Arabs delayed their conversion to Islam till the Conquest (of Makkah). They used to say. ‘Leave him (i.e. Muhammad (s) and his people (Quraish): if he overpowers them then he is a true Prophet. So, when Mecca was conquered, then every tribe rushed to embrace Islam."
Allah (swt) revealed


((لَا يَسْتَوِي مِنْكُمْ مَنْ أَنْفَقَ مِنْ قَبْلِ الْفَتْحِ وَقَاتَلَ أُولَئِكَ أَعْظَمُ دَرَجَةً مِنَ الَّذِينَ أَنْفَقُوا مِنْ بَعْدُ وَقَاتَلُوا))


"Not equal among you are those who spent (in the way of Allah) and fought before the conquest [of Makkah] (and those who did so thereafter). Those are greater in rank than they who spent afterwards and fought." [al-Hadeed: 10]


Insha-Allah, a similar reward is waiting for those who have chosen to live a life of a stranger at the compromise of the luxuries of this world.
But this status has some ingredients without which this reward cannot be achieved and that are associated with this Dawah. To achieve these rewards, a dynamism, seriousness and focus similar to that of those who completed this task in the first instance - the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is needed. The habits of the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) will need to be adopted because that is the group which is certified by Allah (SWT) in Quran for their faith, benchmark, patience and perseverance. Allah says,


((رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوا عَنْهُ))


"Allah is well pleased with them and they are with Him..." [al-Tawba: 100]; and


((وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَهَاجَرُوا وَجَاهَدُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَالَّذِينَ آوَوْا وَنَصَرُوا أُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ حَقًّا لَهُمْ مَغْفِرَةٌ وَرِزْقٌ كَرِيمٌ))


"But those who have believed and emigrated and fought in the cause of Allah and those who gave shelter and aided - it is they who are the believers, truly. For them is forgiveness and noble provision." [al-Anfal: 74]


When a Dawah carrier goes through this hadith that;


«ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة»


"...then there would be a Khilafah "Caliphate" on the method of Prophethood."


He seems to be happy upon the glad tidings given by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and his heart is stirred with satisfaction. He, therefore, is supposed to look into this hadith which informs us that the Khilafah "Caliphate" is going to be restored and it also indicates that it would be restored upon the method of Prophethood, which means that this group is have to have similar attributes which were possessed by the previous group, which first established the State of Islam. Therefore it becomes compulsory upon us to read the life of those who established the first State of Islam together with Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) so that the State of Islam is established through the same procedure. We need to go through the life of Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) to see how important this Dawah was for them and what were their attributes. As a reminder let us discuss some events regarding this subject matter because Allah (SWT) says in Quran;


((وَذَكِّرْ فَإِنَّ الذِّكْرَى تَنْفَعُ الْمُؤْمِنِين))


"For verily, the reminding profits the believer" [al-Dhariyat: 55]


Amr ibn al-Jamuh (RA) was an Ansari Sahabi, whom Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) made leader of Banu Salama by replacing Jad bin Qays. He was disabled by one leg and used to limp while walking. He came to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the Battle of Badr and sought his permission to participate in Jihad. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) replied, "You are disabled and free by Allah's leave", therefore he didn't participate. He had four sons who participated. Moaz who killed Abu-Jahl and cut his leg was one of these. On the occasion of Battle of Uhud he expressed his will to participate in the war to his sons, whereas they replied, "You are disabled and free by Allah's leave", but he denied and went to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and said that my sons are not allowing me to go with you, and said, "By Allah, I hope that with a limp leg I will walk over to the Abode of Paradise". Because of pushing Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) he (pbuh) asked his sons, "What if you don't stop him? Maybe he shall be awarded martyrdom by Allah (SWT)." So he went for jihad, as he was disabled, he couldn't resist much and embraced martyrdom quickly, his son Khallad was also martyred in that war.


After the war, his wife Hind intended to bring back her husband and son by camel to bury them in Madinah, but whenever she tried to move toward Madinah, the camel sat down, whereas the camel moved faster when directed towards Uhud. She informed Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) so he (pbuh) asked, "Did he say something before leaving Madinah?" She replied, "Yes" and told that he prayed that, "Oh Allah! Don't send me back to my family". Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said, that's why the camel didn't move further towards Madinah. He (pbuh) further added, "By Allah, in whose Possession lies my life, within you there are people, if they swear upon Allah (SWT), Allah (SWT) will definitely fulfill it and Amr ibn al-Jamuh is one of them."


Subhan-Allah! Such are the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) whose disability couldn't prevent him from participating in the battle. He didn't make an excuse of his disability. If he wished, he could've done that. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) buried Amr ibn al-Jamuh together with Abdullah bin Amr bin Haram in a single grave stating that, "Bury Amr ibn al-Jamuh and Abdullah bin Amr in a single grave, for the they loved each other just for the sake of Allah (SWT)."


At that time the condition was such that shrouds were not available for covering the martyrs, so a single blanket was used to cover Abdullah bin Amr, that blanket covered his face and fell short leaving the feet uncovered, that were then covered by grass. This grave is located in Nasheeb. After forty years during the reign of Muwaiya, there was a flood due to which a canal was to be taken out. On this occasion, the grave was opened in the presence of Jabir bin Abdullah the son of Abdullah bin Amr. They found that both the buried bodies were intact and fresh. In another narration, it was stated that, "The bodies had their hands placed on their wounds and when people removed their hands, blood started flowing from their wounds and when their hands we replaced, the blood stopped flowing." (Tabaqat ibn Sa'd, Muwatta)
Such was the quality of the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) that they always used to move ahead in the way of Islam, never did they keep themselves behind and in this attempt they never worried about difficulties and trials. They always tried that every coming day is better in terms of reward and pleasure of Allah (SWT) than the previous day. No doubt, even today the struggle of the implementation of the Deen of Islam through the establishment of Khilafah "Caliphate" is not like an everyday activity, rather this can only be achieved by working tirelessly, day and night, just like the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) did. Therefore, the Dawah carrier will have to show similar passion and conviction as was shown the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).


We can find an example of such passion and conviction in the Battle of Tabuk. This battle is also called Ghazwa-e-Usrah because of the lack of warfare material and transportation. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) ordered for the preparation of the battle and regarding this asked his companions to spend from their wealth. The Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) participated very enthusiastically. Tabuk was very far from the city of Madinah. Travelling by foot was very difficult, so mounts were arranged. Few poor companions who were seven in number came to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and said, we want to participate in Jihad but we don't have mounts, so kindly arrange them for us. After listening to their request, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) replied that, "I don't have mounts to provide for you". These seven companions cried over their absence in battle and left. Salim bin Umair was one of them, he was from the ‘Ashab-e-Suffa'. Allah (swt) praised their sincerity in Quran, saying,


((وَلَا عَلَى الَّذِينَ إِذَا مَا أَتَوْكَ لِتَحْمِلَهُمْ قُلْتَ لَا أَجِدُ مَا أَحْمِلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ تَوَلَّوْا وَأَعْيُنُهُمْ تَفِيضُ مِنَ الدَّمْعِ حَزَنًا أَلَّا يَجِدُوا مَا يُنْفِقُونَ))


"Nor is there blame on those who came to you to be provided with mounts, and when you said, I can find no mounts for you, they turned back while their eyes overflowing with tears of grief that they couldn't find anything to spend (for Jihad)." [At-Tawba: 92]


Similar is the case of Abu Dharr al-Ghifari. At the time of the Battle of Tabuk, the weather was extremely hot & humid and the battle was against Rome; superpower of that time. Hypocrites were finding excuses for not participating in the battle. Allah (SWT) has mentioned the condition of the hypocrites in the following way;


((وَقَالُوا لَا تَنْفِرُوا فِي الْحَرِّ قُلْ نَارُ جَهَنَّمَ أَشَدُّ حَرًّا لَوْ كَانُوا يَفْقَهُونَ * فَلْيَضْحَكُوا قَلِيلًا وَلْيَبْكُوا كَثِيرًا جَزَاءً بِمَا كَانُوا يَكْسِبُونَ))


"And they said "march not forth in the heat" say: "The fire of hell is more intense in the heat", if only they could understand! So let them laugh a little and (they will) cry much as a recompense of what they used to earn (by committing sins)." [At-Tawba: 81-82]


From among those who made excuses from participating in the battle, was Jad bin Qays from the tribe of Bani Salma, from whom Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) asked, "Will you participate in the battle?" Jad bin Qays replied that, "O Messenger of Allah, leave me and don't put me in trial. All my people know how weak I am in the matter of women, so while travelling if I get to see Roman women, I will not be able to hold back." Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) then turned his face away from him. In this matter an ayah of Quran was revealed;


((وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ يَقُولُ ائْذَنْ لِي وَلَا تَفْتِنِّي أَلَا فِي الْفِتْنَةِ سَقَطُوا وَإِنَّ جَهَنَّمَ لَمُحِيطَةٌ بِالْكَافِرِينَ))


"And among them is he who says, "Permit me [to remain at home] and do not put me to trial." Unquestionably, into trial they have fallen. And indeed, Hell will encompass the disbelievers." [At-Tawba: 49]


While on the other side is the example of Abu Dharr al-Ghifari, who was travelling on a camel that was weak and during the journey it came to a halt and was not able to move. Abu Dharr tried a lot to get the camel moving but he failed, so he unloaded the entire luggage, loaded on his back and started following the army in the extreme weather and finally got to meet Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).


Another characteristic of the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was how they considered this world insignificant. When a Dawah carrier meets people and gives them Dawah, he will find many people who love this Deen of Islam a lot but the only thing that hinders them from accepting the responsibility of carrying this Dawah is the fear of losing worldly luxuries, love of wealth, worries about their lifestyle and lessening of their businesses. No doubt, this problem of materialism erupts from this very Capitalist System that has engulfed this world.
Abu Bakr during his rule once asked for water to drink and people gave him a drink of honey, he immediately removed the cup after he got the taste of honey and started crying. Everyone around him also started crying. People then asked him as to what made him cry, he replied that, "Once I was with Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) He (pbuh) was pushing someone, although there was no one present there, so I asked, "Whom are you pushing". Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) replied that, "This world appeared in front of me as a statue, I asked her to leave and she left, then she appeared again and said, "You will protect yourself from my evil, but those after you will not be able to do so." So Abu Bakr said, "This very event came to my mind and I was afraid that this world might engulf me." So worried and alert Abu Bakr was in this matter that, even a slight increase in any blessing used to worry him. Today, we use so many blessing of Allah (SWT), but do we think about it?


Here it is necessary to know that, it was not that Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) didn't use the blessings of Allah or they didn't show gratitude towards Allah (SWT). Two companions from the ‘Ashra-e-Mubashara', namely Uthman bin Affan and Abdur Rehman bin Auf were very wealthy. Abu Bakr and Umar bin Khattab had agricultural lands which they used to cultivate. And no doubt this is not at all a correct view that one should only have as much as is necessary to only satisfy one's basic needs and shouldn't be availing luxuries. If that would have been the case in Islam, there wouldn't have been rulings on the matter of inheritance. And Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said;


«لَا بَأْسَ بِالْغِنَى لِمَنْ اتَّقَى اللهَ»


"There is no issue with wealth for the one who fears Allah (SWT)." (Ahmad)


However, what a Dawah carrier should be aware of is the fact that today for an honest man, earning a livelihood through legitimate means is becoming more and more difficult, where on the other hand this system has opened doors to ways through which one can earn a livelihood through illegitimate means. These rulers are implementing the policies of the World Bank and IMF to make lives of people even more difficult, so their circumstances shouldn't entrap him and he shouldn't lose conviction and Shaytan shouldn't change his priorities and he should not incline towards this world. Because Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said;


«يهرم ابن ادم و یشب منه اثنان الحرص علی المال والحرص علی العمر»


"A human keeps getting old, but two things within him always remain young; the desire of a longer age and increasing wealth." (Agreed upon)


The Dawah carrier should also keep in mind this saying of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh),


«إِنَّ لِكُلِّ أُمَّةٍ فِتْنَةً وَفِتْنَةُ أُمَّتِي المَالُ»


"Indeed, for every Ummah there is a temptation and for my Ummah that temptation is wealth." (Tirmidhi)
And he (pbuh) also said;


«لا الفقر اخشی علیکم ولکن اخشی ان تبسط علیکم الدنیا فتنافسوها کما تنافسوها فتهلککم کما اهلکتهم»


"It is not poverty I fear for you, but I fear that the world is made abundant for you, such that you start competing over it, just like those before you and it will destroy you just like it destroyed them." (Bukhari)
And he (pbuh) also said;


«ان اخوف ما اتخوف علی امتی الهوی وطول الامل فاما الهوی فيصد عن الحق واما طول الامل فينسی الآخرة»


"Indeed, I fear for my Ummah; worldly desires and long hopes. For worldly desires prevent you from Haqq, while long hopes make you unaware of the Afterlife." (Bayhaqi)


And Imam Ahmad has narrated in his Musnad that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said,


«اثنان یکرههما ابن ادم یکره الموت والموت خیر للمومنین من الفتنة ویکره قلة المال وقلة المال اقل للحساب»


"A human does not consider two things good, while they are good for him; he dislikes death, while death is good for a believer as it protects him from temptation, he dislikes the lack of wealth, while lack of wealth results in a lesser accountability."


The Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) used to remind people about the insignificance of this world. One day Abu Huraira went to the market and called upon the people asking, "Which thing has prevented you?" People asked, "Prevented from what?" Abu Huraira responded, "The legacy of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is being distributed and you people are sitting here." People inquired, "Where is the distribution taking place?" He replied, "In the mosque." People immediately ran towards the mosque but there wasn't any distribution taking place. They came back and told Abu Huraira that the was no distribution taking place but rather there were some people were offering prayer, some were reciting the Holy Quran and some were discussing about the Halal and Haram. Abu Huraira replied, "I feel sorry for you. This is the legacy that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has left behind."


Darimi has reported from Abdullah bin Umar that he narrated; "Once I was sitting in the mosque, a group of poor immigrants was also sitting in the mosque and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) arrived and sat amongst that group of immigrants. I too went towards them and heard Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) say, "The poor immigrants should be happy with what is going to make them happy. They will enter Paradise forty years before the wealthy." Abdullah bin Umar further narrates that, "I saw that their faces started glowing and it was such that even I wished that may I be amongst them."


After the conquest of Bait-al-Maqdas, Umar bin Khattab moved towards Bilad-Ash-Shaam (Syria), where he met Abu Ubaidah bin al-Jarah. One day Umar bin Khattab asked Abu Ubaidah, "Take me to your home." Abu Ubaidah asked him, "What will you do in my home?" and tried to avoid taking him to his home. But upon the insistence of Umar bin Khattab, he brought him to his home. In their home apart from the sword, shield and some camel accessories, there was nothing. Umar bin Khattab asked him, "Oh! Abu Ubaidah at least you would have arranged some basic items for yourself." On this Abu Ubaidah bin Jarah replied, "This is enough for taking us to the grave."


These were the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and these were their actions. Today the Dawah carriers have to take the life of the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as a torch for guiding them, only then will they move ahead despite the dominance of Kufr all around. For people his example would be like a lamp in a dark night. The objective of the dominance of the Deen of Islam is only going to be achieved by the way it was achieved by the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

 


Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Dr. Iftikhar, Pakistan

 

Read more...

News and Comment The Hudud Bill Polemic: Implementation of Sharia Is Not a Matter of Choice

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:


On 19th March 2015, the State Legislative Assembly of the State of Kelantan had unanimously approved the amendments to the Kelantan Sharia Criminal Code (II) (1993). This is the second approval by the government of PAS (Islamic Party of Malaysia) of the ‘Hudud Bill' in Kelantan. The next step in realizing the implementation of the bill in Kelantan is for it to be unanimously agreed upon in the Federal Parliament. The tabling of this Hudud Bill has stirred much response from Malaysians of all walks of life. Recently, a video produced by a local radio station criticising the implementation of the Hudud Bill in a condescending way, which went viral over the social media, has raised anger amongst Muslims in Malaysia. Criticism have also been levelled at PAS's intentions by its Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition member, DAP, which has always been critical of PAS's intentions of establishing an ‘Islamic State'. Its advisor, Lim Kit Siang iterated that with the Hudud Bill, PAS has lost support from its non-Muslim voting bloc. The first ruling UMNO member to have publicly declared his position on the Hudud Bill is the former de facto law minister, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz when he boldly said that hudud is unsuitable for Malaysia and those who discuss it are fools. The Hudud Bill is expected to be tabled at the parliament in May 2015.

 

Comment:


Hudud constitutes only a part of the Sharia Law under the punishment system of Islam (uqubat) which comprises four categories - hudud, qisas/jinayat, ta'zir and mukhalafat. This system must be implemented in its entirety. Besides uqubat, the Islamic system also encompasses, among others, the ruling, economic, social, educational and political systems; all of which must be implemented concurrently, without exception. Focusing only on the implementation of hudud is clearly misleading. It should be understood by PAS and by Muslims in general that the Sharia Law must be implemented comprehensively (kaffah) by the state. Allah (swt) has placed the takalif (responsibility) and amanah (trust) on the leader of a country to implement His Laws in its entirety. Therefore, in truth, the Malaysian government is obliged to implement the laws of Allah comprehensively in every inch of the land under her authority and not relieving herself from the responsibility.


As an Islamic party that adopts democracy as its methodology, PAS has clearly been misguided when it places the Law of Allah under the scrutiny of man. Approving hudud by way of tabling, debating, discussing and voting, as had been carried out by the State Legislative Assembly of Kelantan (or the Federal Parliament for that matter) signifies placing the laws of Allah under the democratic process and subjecting it to the approval of man. This is categorically haram because the authority to make laws is vested only upon Allah (swt) and man is ordered to implement them, not vote to decide on their implementation. Furthermore, by attempting to implement hudud under the democratic system opens up a wide opportunity for non-Muslims, liberalists and secularists to oppose and degrade the law of Allah to the point of ridiculing and insulting the divine instruction.


As Muslims it should be clear to us that the implementation of Sharia Law in its entirety is obligatory and it must be carried out by mechanisms that are in line with the Sharia - not via the deceptive democratic instruments. Its implementation is not open to choice. And its implementation, in line with the spirit of taqwa, will, by Allah's promise, bring about justice and prosperity. It has now been more than 50 years that Malaysia have gained her independence but the government keeps on furnishing countless reasons for not implementing the laws of Allah despite the realization that the desire of Muslims to be re-governed by Sharia is getting stronger and stronger. It should also be clear to Muslims that the only guarantee that Islam will be implemented in its entirety is when it is under the political dominion of the Khilafah "Caliphate", hence, it is about time that Muslims in Malaysia and in all parts of the world to unite and intensify our efforts to re-establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" upon the way of the Prophethood which shall implement not only hudud, but the Sharia in its entirety and bring about justice, peace and prosperity to this temporary abode of man.

 

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Dr. Muhammad - Malaysia

 

 

Read more...

Freedom of Speech Spearheads the War on Religion

  • Published in Analysis
  •   |  

The comment of the present Pope Francis in the aftermath of the attacks on the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo is a reminder of the deep contradiction between religion and freedom of speech. Pope Francis remarked, in simple layman terms, that if someone were to say something offensive about the Pope's mother then he could expect to receive a punch in the face. Speech, in other words, has serious consequences and cannot be conducted irresponsibly.

Simply avoiding recklessness in the use of free speech is insufficient; the principle itself is fundamentally flawed. Freedom of speech is an irreligious ideal originating from a materialist worldview that has become a key intellectual weapon in the secular West's ideological war on religion. It is necessary for sincere people of religion to abandon secularist intellectual constructs and return to conceptual frameworks that are consistent with true religious belief.

Freedom to be secular

Freedom of speech is presented as if it were a neutral principle, allowing all sides to express their points of view openly, in order that all may judge which is best. But no such principle can ever be truly neutral. In fact, freedom serves the secularist agenda only. People of religion are at a serious disadvantage within a society built on such principles, as is evidenced by the weakening of religion in the West during three centuries of secular rule. Freedom of speech assumes sovereignty for man, not for man's Creator. By accepting freedom of speech, this secular worldview is already locked in before discussion can even begin. If the man of religion engages in discussion on the basis of free speech, then he will be forced to reformulate the rest of his thinking on this secular basis also. If, for example, a Jew, Christian or Muslim attempted to say that their scripture is explicit in forbidding adultery in society, then he will be told that it is not valid for him to call for this as it contradicts the very freedom that he is himself enjoying in stating his case.

Secularists say that freedom of speech is necessary psychologically as suppression of feelings and desires can be harmful for the individual. But preventing harm to the individual cannot justify crassly hurting the feelings of others in some misleading expectation of catharsis. Negative feelings and harmful desires require deep introspection and treatment and not instant expression or gratification. The ideal of free speech fails to evoke the necessary intelligence and wisdom in discourse that is essential to harmonious, civilised society. Tolerance in society is achieved through inculcating respect for each other, and not by insisting on the freedom to voice whatever comes into one's head. In other contexts, secularists will say that one is free only to the extent that one does not impair the freedom of others or bring harm to them. Is hateful speech not harmful? Does ridicule not impair one's freedom? Secularists gleefully caricature what religion holds to be sacred. The true secularist agenda, blatant in their satire, is to undermine religion and not to tolerate it. People of religion, even when they disagree, do not stoop to ridicule the beliefs of others. Islam, for example, clearly warns against slandering others' gods, even if these be pagan idols, and the Islamic world was championed for its legacy of religious tolerance, from Andalusia to India.

Secularists argue that free speech is necessary to protect against oppression. This argument is false. Oppression is possible whenever man is given authority over his fellow man. While freedom, and the egocentric individualism it instils, only reduces empathy for others, the religious disposition softens the hearts of those in authority while inspiring those under them to stand firmly against any form of tyrannical behaviour. There is a long history, in Christianity as well as Islam, of pious believers challenging tyranny. Western secular liberal democracies have proved far more oppressive than the religious states that preceded them. There are more people of African descent in what is becoming known in the United States as its "prison-industrial complex" than there were slaves at the time of America's civil war. Indeed the United States has the highest proportion of prisoners in the world today. The West portrays itself as the land of the free; but it is freedom with a great number of seemingly necessary limitations and exceptions.

The secularists argue that religion leads to militant conflict, and that freedom of speech inculcates an attitude of toleration in all. Military conflict occurs wherever political and institutional processes break down. Western secular liberal democracies, with their capitalist imperial ambitions and their rapacious military-industrial complexes, have inflicted unimaginably higher levels of military terror across the world than all the religious states that preceded them. Islam had never engaged in exploitative colonial behaviour despite ruling from Spain to Indonesia, and although Christians had done so, the real explosion in empire-building occurred after Europe's revolutions not before. It is materialist dogma that fires the passion for maximising worldly material benefit. Religion has always worked to turn man towards loftier aims.

Secularists will say that freedom of speech is of value to the religious also, because it guarantees their right to express their religious views. We don't need the secularists' idea of freedom to guarantee such rights. These rights were expressed perfectly well before the idea of freedom was developed. The existence of multiple schools of thought in the Jewish, Christian and Muslim faiths is evidence of a long history of toleration for dissenting views. In fact, the secularists advocate religious freedom not to promote genuine religious interpretation but to strengthen so-called ‘modernists' in their manipulation of religious truth in order to covertly incorporate the secularist agenda and wage war on religion from within.

Materialist origins

Freedom of speech first emerged in European political discourse in the 17th Century CE when atheistic thinkers exploited the wars within Christianity to advance their materialistic agenda. The key breakthrough of these atheists was to furnish their ancient materialist creed with the political doctrine of freedom and democracy. According to these atheists, freedom and democracy follows naturally from materialism: if there is no Creator then man is master of his own destiny and sovereignty resides in him; therefore, man should be given freedom to live his life as he pleases and nations should embrace democracy so that they can devise laws in accordance with their collective will. Furthermore, if the hereafter does not exist, man can abandon self-denying altruism and throw himself into whole-bodied pursuit of worldly pleasure and gain.

This materialist political doctrine presented an apparently insurmountable challenge to Europe's Christian rulers. Their solution was to adopt a compromise between materialism and religion in the name of objective empiricism, under which materialist political doctrine would be accepted but ‘metaphysical' debate about religious beliefs would be sidestepped. They viewed this compromise as necessary in order to protect Christian creed without realising that they were destroying the Christian civilisation built upon this creed. The ideas of freedom and democracy were effectively grafted onto a new secular creed that, while retaining religion, separated it from life. The Christian holds his creed as private, personal belief only while the public domain is swamped by the secular creed and its materialistic political culture. Man is a social being; constant public bombardment by materialist values will relentlessly dominate all else. Genuine ethics, humanity and spirituality become suppressed as man rushes to gorge himself on material worldly benefit alone.

Freedom of speech sets the terms for intellectual discourse within secular society. By adopting the principle of free speech, the West opened the door for the extensive propagation of materialist values within what was previously religious Christian society. Materialist ideologues strongly campaigned for freedom of speech from the outset and used this principle to justify vehement attacks on Christianity as well as other religions. Even today, secularists rejoice in viciously savaging religious values in the name of satire or art. The appallingly disgraceful Charlie Hebdo caricatures are just the latest example of this.

Rights not freedom

Each society is shaped by a particular set of principles and values that sets the collective terms for the behaviour of its citizens and societal interaction between them. It is not possible for a single society to adopt multiple conflicting value sets, just as it is not possible for a single society to adopt multiple alternate legal constitutions. Freedom of speech provides only a faulty and biased platform for the conduct of discourse within society, and people of religion must move beyond this. Christian thinkers had long championed ‘natural rights' within society since their medieval age, rights presumably adopted from Islam which at that time was the dominant world civilisation, and which had successfully implemented Islam's lofty concepts of ‘huqooq Allah' and ‘huqooq al-ibad'. The concept of well-defined divinely-ordained immutable rights forms a much sounder foundation for intellectual discourse and, indeed, for all other forms of human behaviour and interaction, than the abstract concept of freedom which secularists champion when beneficial but readily furnish with rationally-conceived limitations and exceptions when not.

Only three centuries ago, the entire world was dominated by religion. Religion is on the rise again. The intensified secular propaganda against religion, in the name of free speech, is just one further indication of how keenly the Western secular powers sense the religious resurgence, particularly amongst Muslims, whom they have targeted in a renewed war on Islam. Sincere Muslims are working hard to educate their societies about the evils of secularism and to re-establish the righteous Islamic Khilafah "Caliphate", which will structure society on the basis of immutable divinely-ordained rights, restoring man's dignity and returning society to the harmony and tranquillity that existed before the usurpation of the world by disbelieving Western secularist imperialists. The true Islamic State will re-inherit its position as the leading state in the world and once again manifest the highest model of civilisation for all the peoples of the world to emulate, thus bringing to an end the rule of secularism and the atheistic materialism at its heart.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Ibn Nussrah, Pakistan

Read more...

News and Comment In 1300 years of Khilafah not a single woman was burnt to death by a mob

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - On 22nd March 2015, an Afghan woman who was beaten to death by a mob was buried in Kabul on Sunday, her coffin carried aloft by women's rights activists. Hundreds of people gathered in northern Kabul for the funeral of 27-year-old Farkhunda, who like many Afghans is known by only one name. She was killed late Thursday by a mob of mostly men who beat her, set her body on fire and then threw it into the Kabul River, according to police accounts. Police are still investigating what prompted the mob assault. The head of the Interior Ministry's criminal investigation directorate, Gen. Mohammad Zahir, said no evidence had been found to support those allegations."We have reviewed all the evidence and have been unable to find any single iota of evidence to support claims that she had burned a Quran," Zahir said. "She is completely innocent." He said that 13 people had been arrested in connection with her killing.

Comment:

This incident has sparked worldwide anger against the lynch mob actions of the crowd that burnt this school teacher, who was just about to finish her graduation of Islamic studies, on mere suspicion. This condemnable act happened just few days after two men were set ablaze by an angry mob of Christian protesters in neighboring Pakistan, who were protesting violently against the twin blasts that targeted the Roman Catholic Church and Christ Church during Sunday mass on 15 March 2015. Both acts of violence happened under the rule of secular and liberal Capitalist system, which has professed to protect women rights and human rights by its implementation of the concepts of freedoms, equalities and social justice. However the reality is that this rotten system has not only failed to protect the dignity, honor and life of women but also put her at the disposal of mob justice without any retribution for the crimes of the criminals. Under the judicial systems of both the countries Pakistan and Afghanistan, the criminals are freed if they belong to the elite class and are able to buy their way out of the jail, while the weak and often innocent are punished. The legal system is based on British man-made laws, with procedural complications that delay the court cases to decades. The justice is not only denied but it is costly and mostly results in oppression of the innocent.

The mob culture is replacing the judicial and legal recourse to justice at a fast pace, which is an alarming situation. It usually happens when people have no trust at the judicial system and police and they strongly believe that the criminal will be eventually freed by the police. However this would not have happened if the Islamic judicial system was implemented under the Khilafah "Caliphate", along with all the systems of Islam. We have never heard about a mob inflicting harm to either men or women accused of a crime on the streets of Khilafah "Caliphate" state, under the 1300 years of rule on a wide area of the world. Even in Afghanistan, the rights of women were well guarded until the beginning of 20th century under the Islamic judicial system. On the contrary, now after the US led invasion of Afghanistan the acts of violence against the women have increased many folds. According to a member of Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan," Now the case of violence against women is more than in the time of the Taliban." And Sonali Kolhatka, Co-director of Afghans women's charity, says, "There were 23 rape cases in just 2 months, in north Afghanistan. The attacks of violence against women, both external and within the family, have gone up. Domestic violence has increased."

Under the Islamic system of Khilafah "Caliphate", women were provided all the facilities of free and speedy justice at her doorstep. She was never afraid to complain in the court of Qadhi, as she was always dealt with fairly and justly. Men were afraid to even raise their fingers towards her in a wrongful way, for fear of being punished by the law of Allah (swt). This system was not based on the whims and desires of man-made laws but upon the laws given by Almighty Allah. The Women Rights organizations, who carried the coffin of Afghan woman upon their shoulders, should rather carry the coffin of the rotten Capitalist system and bury it deep underground so that it never comes out again to haunt the women of Afghanistan and the world again; as it is under this current system, the innocent Farkhandah faced this fate.

Allah (swt) says,

((وَمَن لَّمْ يَحْكُم بِمَا أنزَلَ اللّهُ فَأُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الظَّالِمُونَ))

"And whoever does not rule by that which Allah has revealed, they are the oppressors (Dhaalimun)." [TMQ Al-Ma'ida: 45]

 

 

Written for Central Media Office Hizb ut Tahrir by

Ammara Tahir

Member of Central Media Office Hizb ut Tahrir

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands