Monday, 27 Ramadan 1447 | 2026/03/16
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

News & Comment Is It They who Apportion the Mercy of Your Lord?

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

The Standard Newspaper on Thursday 31st October 2013 reported that the Government plans to vigorously promote a policy requiring women to have only two children. The move comes after the realization that the country can no longer sustain the population at the current birth rates of more than four children per woman. The Kenya Population Situation Analysis released on Wednesday this week by the Ministry of Devolution and Planning says the demand for children is still big in Kenya and must be managed downwards. '' The demand for children is still high and is unlikely to change unless substantial changes in desired family size are achieved among the poor in general, notable in northern arid and semi-arid areas of the country'' says the analysis, the first of its kind to be done in any African country.

Comment:

According to the UNFPA, the world population of 7.2 billion in mid-2013 is projected to increase by almost one billion people within the next twelve years. It is projected to reach 8.1 billion in 2025, and to further increase to 9.6 billion in 2050 and 10.9 billion by 2100. Much of the overall increase between 2013 and 2050 is projected to take place in high-fertility countries, mainly in Africa and Asia. In contrast, the population of the more developed regions is expected to change minimally, passing from 1.25 billion in 2013 to 1.28 billion in 2100. The net increase is due largely to migration from developing to developed countries.

A closer look at such statistics reveals they are intended to raise alarm on the perceived threat that current population growth rates pose to the world. The basis on which they are based is the Capitalist ideology which presumes that we leave in world with unlimited needs and scarce resources i.e. the economic problem facing the world is that of production. This means that any rapid growth in population leads to a strain on the scarce resources which is likely to result into conflict among nations. Such a view led to many so-called developed countries to encourage population controls through massive campaigns in family planning. Europeans have generally been having fewer children due to the decision of many parents to delay having a family. A total fertility rate of around 2.1 live births per woman is considered to be the replacement level while Europe currently has a level below 1.5. This has had a devastating effect as the labour force rapidly ages without any replacement from new births. Surprisingly, when migrants from mostly Muslim countries try to bridge the gap, complaints are raised about population explosion! The idea of population controls has also brought other undesirable effects like child trafficking and abortions. Children are trafficked for adoptions while abortions are common in many countries. It is of great concern that a country like Kenya claims that the population growth rate is very high yet we have vast swathes of uninhabited land that lies idle due to neglect. Curiously, the statistics stress on rapid population growth in arid and semi-arid areas which are mostly inhabited by Muslims. Could this be a sinister move to control the Muslim population? It is also a wonder that with its claim of most developed economy in the region, Kenya has failed to nurture and fully utilize the abundant human resource available as we see University graduates still doing menial jobs! The greed by the wealthy minority to consolidate more riches compels them to fear the poor majority that might one day rise up against them. That is why for over a century, we have been hearing of such alarmist statistics on population growth rates.

Islam as an ideology has a solution as it views the economic problem as being that of distribution of wealth and not production as viewed by Capitalism. Thus, the State provides an enabling environment in which all citizens have access to income generating activities and those that are unable get State help in terms of Zakah and Grants from the State Treasury (Bait ul-Mal). In fact, Islam encourages progressive birth rates as the youth form the backbone of any State that wishes to have advanced development. The world has got vast resources that are enough to satisfy all our needs and at no time can the human race fill the whole world as our Creator placed a natural way to balance the population through deaths.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Kassim Agessa
Member of Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir in East Africa

Read more...

Why Muslims Should NOT Use "Personal Freedom" or "Human Rights" to Argue Against Niqab Bans - PART 1 -

  • Published in Analysis
  •   |  

As the attack on the niqab by politicians and the media intensifies in Britain, Canada, and other Western secular states, Muslims have once again felt pressure to defend yet another of their Islamic practices and to argue against its ban. There is no doubt that it is not a piece of cloth that is on trial here but the latest face of the attack on Islamic values and beliefs. It follows the hysteria created around the jilbab, Shariah, polygamy, and Islam's segregation of the genders, as well as its view on marriage and divorce, homosexuality, gender roles, politics, judicial punishments, and even the concept of one Ummah, amongst many other issues, including insults against the Qur'an and our beloved Prophet (saw). Therefore, whether as Muslims we view the face veil as an Islamic obligation, recommendation, or something that is simply permitted for the woman, the fact that it is based upon a valid Islamic opinion and that it is Islam that is on trial here and not just the niqab, means that we must all respond to this latest assault on our deen. But the question is how?

Some have adopted the approach of using "personal freedom" or "human rights" that are enshrined in law within Western secular states to argue the right to wear the niqab. However, just as we passionately defend our Islamic practices in order to fulfil our obligations to Allah (swt) in accordance with His Commands, the basis upon HOW we respond and present our arguments against such attacks should also be in accordance to the dictates of our deen. With this in mind, it must be understood that "personal freedom" is a concept that has no place in Islam. Rather, it is a value that fundamentally contradicts the Islamic Aqeedah for it originates from the man-made secular way of life and liberal ideals that believe that God should have no say in the organisation of the affairs of life and that individuals should be permitted to perform actions, legislate, and live their lives according to their own whims and desires, rather than in line with religious laws. In stark contrast, Islam states that the Creator (swt) is the legislator in all spheres of life. And it commands us as believers to be a slave to Allah (swt) and NOT a slave to our whims, but rather to perform actions and to mould, regulate, and fulfil our desires according to the Laws and Limits laid down by our Creator in the Qur'an and Sunnah. Allah (swt) says in Surah Al-Furqan,

((أرَءَيۡتَ مَنِ ٱتَّخَذَ إِلَـٰهَهُ ۥ هَوَٮٰهُ أَفَأَنتَ تَكُونُ عَلَيۡهِ وَڪِيلاً (٤٣) أَمۡ تَحۡسَبُ أَنَّ أَڪۡثَرَهُمۡ يَسۡمَعُونَ أَوۡ يَعۡقِلُونَ‌ۚ إِنۡ هُمۡ إِلَّا كَٱلۡأَنۡعَـٰمِ‌ۖ بَلۡ هُمۡ أَضَلُّ سَبِيلاً))

"Have you (O Muhammad) seen him who has taken as his ilah (god) his own desire (Hawah)? Would you then be a Wakil (disposer of his affairs) over him? Or do you think that most of them hear or understand? They are only like cattle; nay they are even farther astray from the Path." [Al-Furqan: 43-44]

He (swt) also says,

((فَلَا وَرَبِّكَ لَا يُؤۡمِنُونَ حَتَّىٰ يُحَكِّمُوكَ فِيمَا شَجَرَ بَيۡنَهُمۡ ثُمَّ لَا يَجِدُواْ فِىٓ أَنفُسِہِمۡ حَرَجً۬ا مِّمَّا قَضَيۡتَ وَيُسَلِّمُواْ تَسۡلِيمً۬ا))

"But no, by your Lord, they can have no Iman, until they make you the judge in all disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against your decisions but accept them with the fullest conviction." [Al-Nisa: 65]

In addition, these liberal freedoms implemented within Western and other secular societies are the basis upon which men and women are permitted to dress publically in a sexually provocative way and to engage in extramarital relationships, even adultery. They are the basis upon which businesses and the advertising, entertainment, and pornography industries are given license to expose, objectify, and sexualise the bodies of women for profit. And they are the basis upon which insults against the Qur'an, our beloved Prophet (saw) and our deen are accepted, entertained and even encouraged within societies that sanctify freedom of expression. All of this has wreaked havoc within states, as warned by Allah (swt),

((وَلَوِ ٱتَّبَعَ ٱلۡحَقُّ أَهۡوَآءَهُمۡ لَفَسَدَتِ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتُ وَٱلۡأَرۡضُ وَمَن فِيهِنَّ‌ۚ بَلۡ أَتَيۡنَـٰهُم بِذِڪۡرِهِمۡ فَهُمۡ عَن ذِكۡرِهِم مُّعۡرِضُونَ))

"If the truth had been in accord with their desires, truly the heavens and the earth and all beings therein would have been in confusion and corruption! Nay we have sent them their admonition but they turn away from their admonition." [Al-Mu'minun:71]

None of this can we possibly accept as Muslims, and therefore not only must we reject these liberal freedoms but we should NEVER use such a corrupt concept to defend our right to practice our honourable, noble Deen. Furthermore, the ideal of "Human Rights" as defined by secular institutions such as the UN or the European Court of Human Rights is not a universal value common to all human beings regardless of religious belief, nor are they simply associated with the right of individuals to the protection for example of their life, property, or religion. Rather such "human rights" also have a non-Islamic ideological basis for they stem from the preservation of liberal freedoms. In the pre-amble to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, it states, "Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms", which essentially refers to liberal freedoms, including the right of individuals to leave their faith and pursue any sexual relationship they desire, which contradicts Islam.

Alongside this, we have witnessed countless times the erratic, unpredictable and hypocritical manner by which secular governments and institutions implement such freedoms which can be here today and gone tomorrow based on the prejudice of their people or the whims of rulers and judges, as demonstrated by hijab, niqab, and even minaret bans within various liberal states such as France, Belgium, and Switzerland. In 1998, even the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (the highest human rights court in Europe) in a case against Turkey's hijab ban in public buildings, ruled in favour of upholding the ban, justifying their decision on the basis of protecting the secular basis of Turkey. In 2004, the ECHR also ruled in favour of the French hijab ban in state schools, commenting that the actions of the French government did NOT violate "freedom of religion" and that such bans issued in the name of separating church and state (i.e. to protect secularism) could be considered "necessary in a democratic society". It is clear therefore that personal freedom and human rights under secular states and institutions are guaranteed only for those who tow the secular line - that is those who limit the practicing of their religious faith to their homes and mosques and away from public life - which Muslims who adhere to their Islamic obligations do not, and cannot conform to. So as Muslims, how can we base our arguments upon this ‘elastic' concept that contradicts Islam and has no fixed basis but rather can change like the wind, according to the misconceptions, misinformation, and bigotry towards Islam present within societies?

So as Muslims, we should reject such non-Islamic ideas and not use them as the basis to formulate our arguments against attacks on our deen or to protect the right to practice our Islamic beliefs. Rather, our response to calls for bans on the niqab or any other aspect of our deen should be based upon Islam alone.

((فَٱحۡڪُم بَيۡنَهُم بِمَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ‌ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعۡ أَهۡوَآءَهُمۡ عَمَّا جَآءَكَ مِنَ ٱلۡحَقِّ‌ۚ لِكُلٍّ۬ جَعَلۡنَا مِنكُمۡ شِرۡعَةً۬ وَمِنۡهَاجً۬ا‌ۚ ))

"So judge between them by that which Allah hath revealed, and follow not their desires away from the truth which hath come unto thee. For each We have appointed a divine law and a traced-out way." [Al-Maeda: 48]

 

Part 2 of this article will address how Muslims should respond to this attack on the niqab.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Dr. Nazreen Nawaz
Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

 

Read more...

News & Comment Azerbaijan's New Educational Strategy is Doomed to Failure  

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

On the 25th of October 2013 Azernews reported that the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, introduced an education development strategy to create an economically stable education system with infrastructure based on up-to-date technologies and qualified teachers. A cabinet of Ministers have been given five months to submit a plan of action and development goals are to be reviewed annually.

 

Comment:

Since Azerbaijan achieved independence from Russia the topic of adopting a new education structure has been put on the agenda of the Parliament each year, but to no avail. The low level of public spending on education has resulted in decreased faculty salaries, which in turn resulted in a system rife with corruption and inequality affecting all levels of society from elementary schools to universities. The level of education given at secondary schools does not adequately prepare students for university entrance exams and some teachers intentionally withhold information that will be on the exams in order to set the students back.  21 years after independence from Russia, secular Azerbaijan is therefore still in the process of defining appropriate educational standards and curriculums - a sad reality mirrored within other countries in the region that have also adopted the secular political system and who share the same corruption, inefficiencies, and poor state education structures. In 2010, the Telegraph reported that according to Indem, a Moscow-based think tank, paying for good school exam results, for entrance into university, and to pass university courses is a multimillion dollar industry in Russia.

The secular Azerbaijan leadership has failed to meet the basic educational needs of its people due to its adoption of the liberal secular approach to policy making. This is collaborated by the fact that secular nations such as the US and UK with long standing educational infrastructures that have had plenty of time to refine their systems are also failing their students. A report released in April 2013 reveals that 1 In 4 Americans are completing high school late and that students lag far behind other countries. Chester Finn, a former senior US Education Department official stated that "...despite all of the reforming, the gains are so modest, they ought to serve to energize and even panic today's policymakers" President Ilham's new strategies are therefore doomed to failure, just like those of years past for they are neither sincere nor sound. This is because they are partial cosmetic changes implemented under a man-made system that is inherently flawed and that has been demonstrated the world-over to have failed nations.

A brighter future for education in Azerbaijan can only be secured by the return to the Islamic education system under the Khilafah "Caliphate". Under this state, the Muslim lands led the world in innovation and learning with international dignitaries sending their youth to be educated in our world class universities and institutions. This was due to the complete application of the Islamic ideology that truly values education, views it as a basic right of every citizen - male and female, has a sound economic system to fund it adequately, and encourages individuals to excel in every field of life for the good of humanity, including in academia, technology, medicine, and science. This first-class education system will return once again upon the rebirth of this state in the region. The draft constitution of Hizb ut Tahrir for the Khilafah "Caliphate" states: "It is an obligation upon the State to teach every individual, male or female, those things which are necessary for life. This should be provided freely to all and should be done in the primary and secondary levels of education. The State should, to the best of its ability, provide the opportunity for everyone to continue higher education free of charge." It is therefore, only with a return to this tried, tested, and successful political model as defined by Islam that Azerbaijan's education crisis can be resolved.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Imrana Mohammad

Read more...

No Zakat on Leased Properties...Rather on money if one year has passed over it and it reaches the ‘nisab'

According to the Akhir Lahdha Newspaper Issue 2572, "The joint meeting between the Zakat Chamber in the Khartoum area and the heads of the Regional People's Committees recommended the inclusion of investments in residential real estate within the Zakat figure collected from the Mukallafin (legally responsible) in the residential neighborhoods, through direct contact with the lessor, and dealing with the source of duty...

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands