Monday, 26 Shawwal 1447 | 2026/04/13
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

Protests to Condemn the Australia Spying on Indonesia

  • Published in Pictures
  •   |  

Hizb ut Tahrir / Indonesia organized a series of actions to condemn acts of spying carried out by Australia in Indonesia, most notably the demonstration organized by the party in front of the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, where the Indonesian regime demanded the closing of the Australian embassy and the severance of diplomatic relations with it in response to the Australian regime's acts of spying in Indonesia.

Friday, 19 Muharram 1434 AH corresponding to November 22, 2013 CE

 

For Picture Slideshow: Click Here

 

Read more...

Answer to the Question Regarding Innovation (bid'ah)

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Yesterday as the people were dispersing after Friday prayer, and as you know how the people gather around the doors of the mosque, someone called out: "Send salutations upon the Prophet" to which another person responded: "Remain silent, this is an innovation (bid'ah)." The question is: Is this an innovation or not

Read more...

The Regime in Sudan Offers the Youth as a Sacrifice to Please America

Many newspapers; including Akhir Lahza Newspaper, addressed on Friday, 22/11/2013, the visit of an American team to Sudan, and its organization of the YES Academy Sudan program to teach dance in Khartoum, with the participation of more than 100 youth, evaluated by six American instructors for their dance talent. This program has taken place in cooperation with the Ministry of Culture and Information through the Support and Care for Innovators Fund.

Read more...

The Solution to the Economic Crisis Lies in the Economic System of Islam

As expected, the folly of the Second Economic Forum at the Friendship Hall in Khartoum, on the two days of 23-24/11/2013, convened by the Government of Sudan to resolve the severe economic crisis that hit the country and the people, was adjourned without a radical solution to the economic problem. The roots of the crisis were not even discussed. The emphasis of the dialogue focused on the results that emerged from reasons which they did not seek to understand, and therefore to be treated.

Read more...

Iran is the Real Loser in the Interim Nuclear Deal

  • Published in Analysis
  •   |  

 

On November 23rd 2013, President Obama termed the nuclear deal with Iran as historic, and it was the first time since negotiations commenced in 2003 that brakes were put on Iran's so called nuclear weapons programme. He said, "Simply put, they cut off Iran's most likely paths to a bomb." The Jewish state does not share the same view and is opposed to the deal. The Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called the agreement a "historic mistake".

Other states most notably the Gulf countries are disappointed with the agreement. Shttp://apiservices.krxd.net/um?partner=adnxs&r=http://ib.adnxs.com/pxjami al-Faraj, a security adviser to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), told Reuters that Gulf Arab governments felt slighted by the deal. "Iran is sitting at the high table," he said. "We are left with the leftovers." He added, "We will acquire more weapons. We are going to check if our shopping list is adequate to respond to this. We are going to rally other nations that are hurt by this action into a unified diplomatic campaign."

Meanwhile, Iran struck a celebratory tone. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said, "God's grace and the support of the Iranian nation were the reasons behind this success," while Hassan Rouhani, the Iranian president, summed it up as an overwhelmingly positive deal. "This agreement benefits all regional countries and global peace," he said. So who are the real winners and losers here?

The answer lies in what has been agreed. The deal reached between Iran and the P5+1 (America, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany) is an interim deal and is the first step in a comprehensive agreement to be conclude in the future. The interim accord signed in Geneva sets out the following conditions:

  • Iran will stop installing new centrifuges, and also refrain from using the thousands of centrifuges that have been installed but are not yet enriching uranium.
  • Iran's nuclear fuel stockpile in six months would not be allowed to grow beyond current levels. In practice, Iran would face a choice of either halting enrichment or converting its uranium into metal fuel plates.
  • Iran agreed to halt all production of so-called 20-percent-enriched uranium, a type of fuel that can be easily converted to highly enriched uranium used in nuclear bombs.
  • Iran's entire stockpile of 20-percent fuel - just under 450 pounds - would have to be neutralized through conversion into metal or blending with natural uranium to reduce its purity.
  • Iran would be required to halt work on building fuel rods or other components at its Arak plutonium facility.
  • Iran's nuclear facilities would be subject to unprecedented monitoring, with daily visits by international inspectors who also would have access to recordings by remote video equipment.
  • Iran would receive economic incentives totalling $7 billion over the six months that the interim agreement is in place.

It is evident from the agreement that a number of restrictions have been placed on Iran with the specific aim of disrupting Iran's ability to produce nuclear bombs. Furthermore, Iran has formally opened the door for further intrusive inspections that may lead to the dismantling of Iran's nuclear capacity, which Tehran has painstakingly put in place over the past decade and has spent billions of dollars. Additionally, West's success in dismantling Iraq's military capability and Syria's chemical weapons ability via UN inspections is an ominous sign of what may happen to Iran in the foreseeable future.

Yet despite this, Tehran continues to treat the Geneva agreement as a victory. For instance, Iran's Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, has asserted that the agreement explicitly recognizes Iran's right to enrich uranium. He also said the agreement effectively removed the threat of an American military strike. US Secretary of State, John Kerry rejected both of those contentions. Regarding America threat of force against Tehran, Kerry was unequivocal, he said, "The fact is, the president maintains" the option to use force "as commander in chief, and he has said specifically, he has not taken that threat off the table".

So clearly, Iran is the real loser in this agreement, and the Jewish state and its patron America are true winners, as the Jewish state is not required to dismantle any of its 100 or so nuclear weapons, and America will use Iran to stabilise Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Islam forbids Muslim countries from surrendering their strategic assets to the colonialist powers. Allah says in the Quran:

((...وَلَنْ يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لِلْكَافِرِينَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ سَبِيلًا))

"Allah will never allow the non-believers to have a way (sabil) over the believers." [An-Nisa: 141]

Rather than capitulating to Western powers and surrendering parts of the country's nuclear infrastructure, Tehran should be working towards creating a variety of nuclear weapons that can be used to not only to safeguard Iran but protect the whole Muslim Ummah. This is in compliance with the following verse of Allah:

وَأَعِدُّوا لَهُمْ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُمْ مِنْ قُوَّةٍ وَمِنْ رِبَاطِ الْخَيْلِ تُرْهِبُونَ بِهِ عَدُوَّ اللَّهِ وَعَدُوَّكُمْ وَآخَرِينَ مِنْ دُونِهِمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَهُمُ اللَّهُ يَعْلَمُهُمْ وَمَا تُنْفِقُوا مِنْ شَيْءٍ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ يُوَفَّ إِلَيْكُمْ وَأَنْتُمْ لَا تُظْلَمُونَ

"And prepare against them what force you can and horses tied at the frontier, to frighten thereby the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them, whom you do not know (but) Allah knows them; and whatever thing you will spend in Allah's way, it will be paid back to you fully and you shall not be dealt with unjustly." [Anfal: 60]

But the truth of the matter is that the protection of the Muslim Ummah is far from the minds of Iranian leadership. Their strong support for the despotic Assad, cash payments to Karzai, assistance to Maliki's regime to spread terror in Iraq, and now the surrender of the nuclear programme to the West, clearly illustrates that their allegiance lies with the enemies of the Ummah and confirms the words of Allah:

أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ مِنْ قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَنْ يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَنْ يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا

"Have you seen those who claim to believe in the revelation revealed to you and the revelation revealed earlier? They seek the ruling of taghoot (non-Islam) although they have been ordered to disbelieve in it." [An-Nisa: 60]

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Abu Hashim

Read more...

Answer to the Question How should we estimate the times of the start of the fast Fajr?

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

There are various Ijtihadat, opinions, and views that speak about the validity of fasting and breaking the fast with Saudi Arabia or the nearest Muslim country, and others with the opinion of invalidity. Because there is a sunset that takes place for one hour or half an hour. So we do not know what is correct, and the Islamic Association's Fatawa are similar to Qaradhawi's. So does the Hizb have an Ijtihad on this matter?

Read more...

Federalism is a Project that Destroys the Unity of the Ummah (Translated)

A few days ago a group of advocates for federalism in eastern Libya announced what they called "The government of Cyrenaica territory," containing the names of 24 people to assume ministerial posts. The announcement also contained the division of the territory into four provinces: Ajdabiya, Benghazi, Jabal al-Akhdar, and Tubruq.

This is the third time this group has announced and insisted on this kind of project.

We are surprised by the insistence on this project, and strongly denounce this in a land that is originally unified, and in an area where a vast majority of the people are against the division and fragmentation of their land.

It is as if this group of division is rushing to present its project before a constitution is placed that would most likely include the unity of the country and forbid its fragmentation, so this group is taking advantage of the chaos to impose this division.

If the excuse of those who call for federalism is that their areas suffer of marginalization, neglect and hardship, then they should know that all of Libya suffers from these issues. The solution to marginalization, neglect and hardship is not through federalism here and there, and not simply by dividing the country into territories and provinces. The solution is through the correct and just system of governance that is sent by Allah (swt), which is the great system of Islam, which is a system of unity, not a confederation, in which the governance is centralized and the management is decentralized. In other words, the officials in the territories, provinces, institutes and departments are given all the managerial authority to look care for the affairs of the people and provide them with comfort and realize their interests in the areas in which they live, so that they do not need to refer to the central authority of the state to carry out their everyday affairs.

And the difference between governance and management, is that governance and power are of the same meaning, which is the authority that implements the laws on the people, and is the action of leadership that the Shar' obliged on the Muslims, and the work of this leadership is that of the authority that is given the responsibility of protecting against oppression, and judging between people, and caring for the affairs of all those who carry citizenship and those who live in the country legally. And this authority is that which the Shar' appointed in His (swt) saying:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ أَطِيعُواْ اللّهَ وَأَطِيعُواْ الرَّسُولَ وَأُوْلِي الأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ

"O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you." [An-Nisa: 59]

And they changed the situation that these leaders are the rulers that are chosen by the Ummah, and are given the responsibility of establishing the Ahkam Shari'ah between the people, and caring for their affairs according to these laws, and enforcing general government policies internally and out of the country.

And from this we understand that the issue of governance is centralized in the state and is carried out by rulers who have general authority in areas of the state affairs. As for actions of management, they are carried out by government employees who are appointed by the rulers to carry out the interests of the people and serve them in their areas, and these actions are not centralized as to not impede the interests of the people, and so that they do not have to endure the hardship of travel and going to the center of the state to carry out their interests and everyday needs of education, health, housing, sustenance, clothing, security, judiciary and other general interests of the citizens of the state.

This difference between governance and administration is clear in the life of our blessed Prophet (saw) who is our role model and in the lives of the Khulafa'a after him. The Messenger (saw) was a ruler and guardian of the Muslims in addition to him being a prophet and messenger, so he used to send the Walis as rulers to the Wilayat of the state, and he would order them to apply the Shar' and tend to the affairs of the people, and he would cede the issue to them - considering them rulers - they have general authority, and would not bind them to certain devices and methods to achieve that. We notice that the Messenger (saw) used to send employees and those who have experience in the administrative and everyday issues, and bind them to certain orders and carrying out limited assignments not to be overstepped, and he would send an employee to collect Zakat, so they would collect it and bring it to the Messenger (saw) and he would give them their wages considering them administrative employees and not rulers, because the rulers in Islam are not the Ummah's employees, but they are their representatives to establish the Ahkam Shari'ah.

And from here one can see in the history of Islam how the administrative system in the Islamic state is a decentralized system that proved its success in providing security and stability, and simplified the procedure of the interests of the people and provided them with comfort in their areas and territories however far from the center they were.

Our Libyan Muslim people are a dear part of the great Islamic Ummah, which is connected to it by one Deen and one Aqeedah, and one fate and hope. And our land of Libya is also a dear and important part of our Islamic Ummah, and if the unification of the Islamic Ummah in one Islamic Khilafah "Caliphate" and the unification of its people and land is the ideal, then what we see today of this division and fragmentation and detachment, is contrary to the ideal, and the result of the absence of the one Islamic state (the Khilafah "Caliphate") and the result of the occupation of the lands of the Muslims by the enemies of Islam from the West and East for a long period of time.

And if the Muslims today are unable to unify the people of the Ummah, and unable to unify their lands, and establish their one state, then they should at least maintain the unity of the land and country that they live in until the day of salvation, which we hope will be soon Allah (swt) willing, and they should at least not allow any person in any corner of the corners of Islam to work to fragment the unity of the corner that he lives in, or the unity of the Muslims that live with him.

And in conclusion we say: Oh Libyans who are honored with your Islam and your loyalty to your Ummah, where does federalism fall within the constant of the unity of the Ummah about which Allah (swt) said:

إِنَّ هَذِهِ أُمَّتُكُمْ أُمَّةً وَاحِدَةً وَأَنَا رَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُونِ

"Indeed this, your religion, is one religion, and I am your Lord, so worship Me." [Al-Anbiya: 92]

And where do the callers to federalism fall in carrying their responsibility as Muslims to maintain their Deen and Aqeedah, and the unity of their land and Ummah, and the maintainance of the feelings of their Muslim brothers everywhere, and the feelings of their brothers who live with them on this earth, which are harmed by this issue?

And Allah (swt) helps us, and La Hawla wala Quwata illa Billah.

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands