Thursday, 26 Jumada al-awwal 1446 | 2024/11/28
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

Question and Answer The Economic Crisis in America

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

We know that at the beginning of the Economic crisis in America the Dollar fell significantly with respect to the Euro. However we noticed in recent days that the value of the Dollar with respect to the Euro has risen, whilst the Economic crisis is still at its peak in America. What has caused this rise given this reality?

Read more...

Question and Answer The Reality of Jinn Controlling Human-Being?

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

There are some illnesses which inflict people and which they ascribe to the Jinn. There are also people who claim to see and hear the Jinn, and to command them and carry out many actions through controlling them, or through their controlling people. What is the reality of this? Is there any material, sensorially-perceivable relationship between man and Jinn?

Read more...

َQuestion and Answer Benefiting from Public Property in the Khilafah

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Thus is the case that we have used the principle of interpreting the general in light of the specific and thereby understood that the intent of ‘people' in one of the two narrations is ‘Muslims', and hence there is no right for the Ahl al-Dhimmah in the public property (except for the public utilities, as the evidences clearly indicate), or is there some other understanding in this issue?

Read more...

Question and Answer Miracles and Karamat

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

 Does what is called a ‘karāmah' exist or not? If the answer is yes we seek a comprehensive explanation in this matter, and if the answer is no, then how do we understand the story of the Ahl al-Kahf for instance or Ashāb al-Ukhdūd, or the saying of Umar ibn al-Khattāb (ra), ‘O Sāriya, the mountain!' Similarly the incident of Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas in the Tigris River, and many like occurrences?

Read more...

O Rulers! Do not slander Islam to cover-up your evil deeds

Linking the notorious NRO (Nation Reconciliation Ordinance) with Misaq-e-Madina (Covenant of Medina) doesn't only amount to disgracing Islam but it also brings disrepute for the Messenger of Allah (saaw). We ask the rulers what corruption charges were dropped under Misaq-e-Medina?! How many Sahaba (r.a) were pardoned for murder?!

Read more...

  Operation Moshtarak weakens America's occupation of Afghanistan

  • Published in Politics
  •   |  

 

    Over the past few days the American crusaders have been bragging about the success of operation Moshtarak in the southern province of Helmand, Afghanistan. The operation is the biggest since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, and involves some 15000 soldiers functioning under the aegis of the American aggressors. The goal of the operation is to clear out the Taliban from the town of Marjah and then to keep hold of the territory through a combination of meek Afghan troops and support from the corrupt central government. The role of Karzai's sleazy government is to provide essential services to the local population and the Afghan troops are meant to keep the Taliban out- something which has eluded Karzia and his henchmen for the past nine years.

 These occupying crusaders expect will diminish the local Afghan support for the Taliban and serve as a template to be applied elsewhere in the country. Furthermore, the Americans are convinced that the approach would erode Taliban's effectiveness and force them make concession in any negotiations with the occupiers. This is as far as theory goes. The reality however, threatens to turn very ugly for the Americans and their allies.

Thousands of civilians have fled the area and those who were left behind were unscrupulously targeted by the crusaders. Last week a NATO airstrike slaughtered 12 civilians. Some western newspapers chose to cover up the ghastly crime by claiming that the rogue missile hit the correct target. Yet, none of these media outfits report the glaring fact that more and more afghan men who are not affiliated with Taliban choose stand and fight the crusaders in a desperate bid to protect their Islam, women and children.

Even those who are meant to be on the same side as the occupiers are not safe. A few days ago, a NATO airstrike killed several Afghan policemen. Zemarai Bashary, the Afghan interior ministry spokesman described the incident as a mistake. So if the government cannot stand up to the occupiers and defend those who are responsible for providing security to the local populace, then what chance do ordinary civilians have? All along the Americans have maintained the success of their plan depends on minimizing civilian casualties. And like their previous pseudo pledges the recent bouts of reassurance have turned out to be nothing more than lies.

Nor has the operation provided any long-term answers on what America intends to do with the Taliban that opt to disappear from the combat zone only to reappear somewhere else and cause havoc for the occupiers.

The operation also threatens to bring down the fragile crusaders alliance. Only this Saturday, the Dutch government collapsed over plans to extend its Afghan mission. This means that 2000 Dutch troops will ditch Afghanistan by the end of 2010 and return home defeated and humiliated. The move is a first for the NATO alliance and signals that more European governments are set to follow the Dutch. The Americans are furious and want the Europeans fill the void. "The one most important shortfall is in the category of trainers," said a senior US official. "We'd like them [Europeans] to step up. We'd like every ally to put up more trainers. This is critical." The whole episode threatens to splinter the crusader alliance and has ushered in a period of political uncertainty.

Hence, increasingly and like its previously failed strategies and ineffectual operations, America is relying more and more on the Pakistani army to play a significant role. This explains why India has relented to American pressure and offered talks with Pakistan to resolve bilateral issues- an euphuism for the resolution of Kashmir.  This America hopes will eventually lead to the redeployment of Pakistani soldiers from the border with India to the border with Afghanistan. America has also released overdue payments from the coalition support fund. In return, Pakistan apprehended Mullah Baradar-number 2 in the Afghan Taliban leadership-but is refusing to hand him over to the CIA.  All of this appears to indicate that the Pakistani leadership is haggling with America for a few measly dollars. But why bargain with a losing side?

Anyone with a modicum of common sense can see that America is facing a catastrophic defeat in Afghanistan.  If the Pakistani army switched sides, Pakistan could make America's defeat a reality and end the crusader occupation of Afghanistan and their savagery in the tribal areas.  The practical way to achieve this result is for the Muslims of Afghanistan and Pakistan to work for the re-establishment of the Caliphate. The Caliphate will unite the Pakistan army and Pushtun resistance into a powerful force and then oust the crusaders from the region.

Abid Mustafa

Feb 21 2010

Read more...

Headline news for 25-2-2010

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

 Titles

  • World trade plummets by 12%
  • Strikes in Greece e bring country to a halt
  • Turkey warns Israel against striking Iran
  • U.S. plans for possible delay in Iraq withdrawal
  • Pakistan received $18 billion for siding with America's war against Islam

 

News Detailes:

  • World trade plummets by 12%
    Global trade flows contracted by a catastrophic 12% in 2009, the fastest pace since the second world war, Pascal Lamy, director general of the World Trade Organisation revealed today, as he urged its 153 member countries to breathe new life into the ailing Doha trade round. This latest estimate is considerably worse than the WTO's previous forecast of a 10% decline for last year, underlining the hefty costs of the financial crisis for the world economy. "The main explanation for this freefall in trade has been the simultaneous reduction in aggregate demand across all major world economies," Lamy told a conference in Brussels.

  • Strikes in Greece e bring country to a halt
    This week police in Greece clashed with protesters striking over austerity measures designed to save the economy. Police fired tear gas at a group of some 50 protesters as a rally attended by some 25,000 people ended in Athens. It is the second general strike in two weeks and coincides with growing anger at the EU's response to the crisis. The action was the biggest since Greece's socialist government introduced cuts to bring the country's debt and deficit under control. Greece closed airspace to all flights, while trains and ferries stood idle and archaeological sites remained shut for the day. The country currently has a spiralling public deficit of 12.7%, more than four times higher than eurozone rules allow. The government has pledged to cut this to 8.7% this year, and also reduce the 300bn-euro ($419bn; £259bn) national debt, by freezing public sector salaries, raising the average retirement age to 63 by 2015, and increasing taxes on petrol, alcohol and tobacco. It also wants to crack down on tax avoidance. Greece's black economy is estimated at 30% of official gross domestic product.

 

  • Turkey warns Israel against striking Iran
    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned of an Israeli strike in Iran, saying it would lead to a "disaster in the entire region." In an interview to Spanish newspaper El Pais published on Monday, the Turkish PM responded to a question on the results of a pre-emptive Israeli strike in the Islamic Republic saying, "this would have unforeseeable consequences that I would not even want to imagine." He stressed that the dispute between the West and Iran over the latter's nuclear program must be resolved through diplomatic channels, and added that economic sanctions would also have an impact on the entire region.  "Don't leave the negotiations table until the end of the process," he said. In the past, Turkey has offered to mediate in talks, but the Iranians objected.
    However, Israel is concerned about Turkey's rapprochement with Iran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "There are three strong countries in the Middle East that are not Arab," he said. "Israel has always been rooted in the West. Iran was once Western but is currently the leader of radical Islam. The third is Turkey, which used to be close to the West but in recent years has begun to look eastward, towards Iran, and that is why its systematic glide east should worry us."

 

  • U.S. plans for possible delay in Iraq withdrawal
    The U.S. military has prepared contingency plans to delay the planned withdrawal of all combat forces in Iraq, citing the prospects for political instability and increased violence as Iraqis hold national elections next month. Under a deadline set by President Obama, all combat forces are slated to withdraw from Iraq by the end of August, and there remains heavy political pressure in Washington and Baghdad to stick to that schedule. But Army Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said Monday that he had briefed officials in Washington in the past week about possible contingency plans. Odierno declined to describe the plans in detail and said he was optimistic they would not be necessary. But he said he was prepared to make the changes "if we run into problems" in the coming months. Under Obama's plan, about 50,000 troops will remain in the country through 2011 to train Iraqi forces, perform counterterrorism operations and help with civilian projects. The United States has signed a legal agreement with the Iraqi government to withdraw all forces by the end of 2011. U.S. commanders have already reduced the presence in Iraq to about 96,000 military personnel, Odierno said -- the first time since the 2003 invasion that fewer than 100,000 U.S. troops have been in the country. The U.S. military presence reached a peak of 166,000 troops in October 2007.  "Right now, our plan is to be at 50,000 by the 1st of September," he said. "And if you ask me today, I'm fully committed and I believe that's the right course of action."

  • Pakistan received $18 billion for siding with America's war against Islam
    Pakistan received nearly $18 billion as aid from the United States, including $11.5 billion as military assistance, according to Congressional documents. A Congressional compilation of the US aid to Pakistan says Islamabad has received $6 billion in civilian aid after the September 11 attack in New York. The Obama Administration, in its latest annual budget, has proposed $1.6 billion in military assistance and about $1.4 billion as civilian assistance to Pakistan. This takes the total US aid to Pakistan to more than $20.7 billion post 9/11, according to the data compiled from information received from the Departments of Defence, State and Agriculture and US Agency for International Development. Of the military assistance, the maximum amount $7.345 billion has gone to Pakistan as Coalition Support Fund (CSF), which many do not consider as foreign assistance as this is reimbursement that Pakistan receives for its support of the US military operations in Afghanistan. This is followed by $2.164 billion as Foreign Military Assistance. After coming to power, the Obama Administration has so far provided $1.1 billion ($400 million in 2009 and $700 million in 2010) for Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund/Counterinsurgency Capability Fund. For the year 2011, Obama has proposed to the US Congress $1.2 billion for Pakistan under this category. Non-military assistance to Pakistan has increased considerably under the Obama Administration, which is mainly attributable to the Kerry-Lugar- Berman bill, which grants $7.5 billion to Pakistan in five years beginning 2009.
Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands