Saturday, 22 Dhu al-Qi'dah 1447 | 2026/05/09
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

News & Comment In Democracy Politics is about Attaining or Holding onto Power at All Cost!

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

On November 25, 2013, the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) in Bangladesh announced the schedule for the 10th parliamentary elections, setting January 5, 2014 as the polling day. Immediately after the announcement of the schedule, BNP-led opposition declared a 48-hour countrywide road-rail-waterway blockade in protest, which was later extended to 71 hours. BNP wants the next general election to be held under a non-party government but Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has already formed an election-time cabinet which includes only her ruling alliance partners. Ruling Awami League says that nothing in the world can stop the scheduled election while opposition says that they will resist the unilateral election at any cost.


Comment:

Today, Muslims killing Muslims or putting them on fire in broad daylight has become a regular phenomenon in Bangladesh. The non-Muslims are also targeted to get political mileage. Politics has turned into killing people and then blaming each other for the murders. The opposition parties are trying to get people's sympathy by saying that the ruling party men and plain clothed police have hurled crude bombs directly at innocent passer-by, while the government blames the opposition men for burning people alive by throwing petrol bombs. BNP-led 18-party alliance had enforced a series of 60-hour and 84-hour general strikes in the last week of October and in the first and second week of November. After a ‘successful' first round countrywide blockade, 18-party alliance announced second round 72-hour blockade from November 30. In the last one month, nearly hundred people died due to violence during these political programs.

While the people are being killed and property damaged, the future of Bangladesh is being settled in Washington. On November 20, the Subcommittee on Asia and Pacific of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs of the U.S. Congress had a hearing on the political impasse in Bangladesh. Steve Chabot, chairman of the subcommittee, visited Bangladesh few weeks ago. Witnesses in the hearing testified that the ruling coalition is responsible for causing the political crisis by abolishing the provision for an election-time caretaker government through amendment to the constitution. While discussing the future, they were in agreement that the ruling party is heading for election without the participation of opposition parties. A common aspect of proposed solutions put forward in the hearing was deferral of the election for at least three months, though they differed on modalities.

On the same day, the New York Times ran an editorial, saying, ‘... Bangladesh could face pressure, including perhaps sanctions, from the international community.' Interestingly, Begum Khaleda Zia, the BNP chief, wrote an article in the Washington Times on January 30, 2013, where she urged the U.S. to help. She said, ‘It is time for the world, led by America, to act and ensure that democracy is saved in Bangladesh' and she proposed ‘the Western powers should consider targeted travel and other sanctions...' to be imposed on Hasina and her entourage.

Both BNP and Awami League have been trying desperately to prove that foreign powers are with them. Just like U.S. congressional hearing, Obama-Manmohan discussion and the EU Parliament resolutions on the election issue of Bangladesh received high media coverage. Many international media outlets run stories on Bangladesh on a regular basis. Politicians and analysts debate which party benefited from those international news and foreign manoeuvring. When differences between U.S. and India regarding the election in Bangladesh came into light recently, many so-called politicians did not hesitate to declare that U.S. will protect Bangladesh from Indian aggression. Their argument sounds like people have option to choose a better knife; to get slaughtered with!

Politics of Bangladesh now revolves around visits of foreign ‘dignitaries'. Public opinion have been moulded in such a way that many people hope and pray that the foreign powers will, somehow, dramatically solve the political deadlock. They expect that when the differences between U.S. and India are solved, the election issue of Bangladesh will be resolved automatically. U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Nisha Desai already visited Bangladesh in November. Indian Foreign Secretary Sujata Singh, U.N. Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Oscar Fernandez Taranco and British Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister Sayeeda Warsi will visit Bangladesh between 4th and 12th December. These visits are regarded as the final round of ‘mediation' or a ‘negotiated settlement' for peaceful transfer of power.

Democracy is dying, but in the process, bringing death and destruction. In this democratic system, brutal killings and destruction of properties have been justified to get to power or to hold on to power. Trying to persuade foreign powers by the political parties have been justified in the name of saving democracy. Elections after every five years lets the foreign powers judge the loyalty and performance of the political parties and renew their allegiance. All the while the Ummah is crying for emancipation from the clutches of foreign powers and their agent rulers, wants to bury democracy for good and bring back the Islamic rule. Only the Islamic rule will solve disputes amongst Muslims and unite them, remove the foreign influence from all spheres of life and ensure looking after the affairs of Ummah.

((فَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَأَصْلِحُوا ذَاتَ بَيْنِكُمْ وَأَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ مُؤْمِنِينَ))

"...So fear Allah, end your disputes, and correct the relations between yourselves; obey Allah and His Messenger if you are true believers." [Surah Al-Anfal: 1]

 

Written for The Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Muhammad Raiyan Hasan
Member of Hizb ut Tahrir in Bangladesh

 

Read more...

Answer to the Question Regarding the Time Limit for the Muslims to Establish the Khilafah

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Is the narration used by Hizb ut Tahrir as an evidence for the fixed time limit for the Muslims to establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" correct? From the adopted thoughts of Hizb ut Tahrir is the appointment of a Khalifah for all Muslims; they say it is not permissible for the Muslims to be without a Khalifah for more than three days; if three days passes without any one appointing a Khaleefah for all Muslims, they all become sinful.

Read more...

Wilayah Syria: Lectures and Meetings throughout the Raqqa Mosques

  • Published in Video
  •   |  

Engineer Hisham al-Baba, Head of the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir in Wilayah Syria, gave Masjid lectures and held meetings to build stronger ties of brotherhood among the people in the city of Raqqa, as part of the Hizb's campaign to educate Muslims to unite and rally around the banner of the Messenger of Allah (saw), the Raya of Uqab, the Rayah of La Illaha Illa Allah Muhammad Rasullal Allah, in the face of the criminal Baathist regime, the enemy of Allah and His Messenger and the believers, the killer of women, children and elderly.

Muharram 1435 AH - November 2013 CE

 


 

Lecture in the Al-Imam Hussain Masjid

 

 

 

 

 

Meeting with the People of Raqqa the Al-Imam Hussain Masjid

 

 

 

 

Lecture at the An-Naktha Masjid

 

 

Read more...

Independence Day Celebrations... Did the Colonialist Really Evacuate?

On Saturday 30/11/2013 Yemen celebrated the 46th Anniversary of the evacuation of the last British soldier from the South of Yemen in 30/11/1967. This is how the people of Yemen were fooled by the evacuation of the British Colonialists. But the truth is the British colonialists have evacuated in name but have actually remained.

Read more...

Surely the disbelievers spend their wealth to hinder others from the Path of Allah. They will continue to spend to the point of regret. Then they will be defeated and the disbelievers will be driven into Hell

The British Ambassador in Yemen Jane Marriott said on Sunday 24/11/2013: "There will be no extension to the Dialogue Conference, and the outcomes phase should begin for the citizen to sense it", as it was indicated by the envoy of the secretary-general of the United Nations Jamal bin Omar in his report, entitled "A Statement on the Security Council Briefing" 27/11/2013 for the extension of the dialogue.

Read more...

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم News &Comment ICC: INTERNATIONAL COURT OF CIRCUS

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

News:

The Sunday Standard reported on 1st of December 2013 that there are fresh details emerging on how the United Kingdom played a pivotal role in pushing the hybrid motions (excusal and use of video link) that saved Kenya at the Assembly of State Parties (ASP) meeting at The Hague. Kenya's Foreign Affairs Secretary Amina Mohamed had indicated earlier that Kenya wants to re-introduce the proposal to amend section 27 of the Rome Statute to shield serving heads of states and government from prosecution. The Kenya government had originally banked its hope on the African Union's failed motion for immunity of serving heads of state to shield President Uhuru Kenyatta from prosecution. Had the ASP meeting failed to pass any motion that was to the advantage of Kenya, the ICC had already pronounced that Uhuru Kenyatta attends Court of Session in person.

 

Comment:

There have been heated debates since the ICC started prosecutions against three Kenyans including President Uhuru Kenyatta, his Vice President William Ruto and journalist Arap Sang. The debate has not only taken a national outlook but it has become a regional and international issue. The meeting of ICC member states that was held at the Hague was preceded by many other meetings like the one at Addis Ababa by the African Union in May 2013. In that meeting, African leaders castigated the ICC and supported the position of Kenya that cases facing Heads of State be postponed until they are out of office.

The ICC process in the Kenyan cases does not only display the colonial position of Britain against Kenya but has revealed the lies of the ICC, the African Union together with what is called International Law. As for the colonial stance of Britain against Kenya, despite being the colonial master for many years resulting in murders and land grabbing, up to now it still has an appetite to perpetuate colonialism behind a veil. Britain which is a member of the ICC together with other European countries which are its sponsors has succeeded in using the ICC to bring together Uhuru and Ruto. These upcoming politicians were groomed since the Moi and Kibaki era with the objective of keeping Kenya in its grip and solidifying its political colonialism in Kenya against its arch-rival America. Britain proposing the video link method of prosecution is a sign that the ICC case against Uhuru Kenyatta may ultimately fail as hoped for by Britain.

As for the move by African Union to leave the ICC, this has two outlooks. First, these leaders who have come together to castigate the ICC have not been seen to do the same to oppose institutions like the World Bank and IMF which are colonial institutions like the ICC. These institutions are used by Western colonialists to impoverish citizens of Africa. Why are they not refusing to receive bribes so as to kill Muslims in Africa in the false ‘war on terror'? Second, these same leaders are used by Capitalists to secure their interests through the wrong democratic politics whereby atrocities are committed against the public during each election.

As for the ICC, the truth is that this court has become partially blind to the killings of thousands in Iraq committed by Britain which is a member of the ICC in collaboration with America during Operation Desert Fox. Up to now, the ICC has never opened prosecution - even through a ‘video link' - against the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair who ordered the British Army to conduct the killings. This is clear that the ICC is not a court of justice and has no status even if it is regarded as international. Even so, the international law is a lie as the administrations of Bush senior and junior committed killings in Afghanistan and Iraq as viewed by the United Nations.

We categorically state that there is no international court or international law. That is why it is only the Islamic state of Khilafah "Caliphate" which is expected soon that will dispense justice and won't recognize international law.

 

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

Shabani Mwalimu

Media Representative of Hizb ut Tahrir in East Africa

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands