On 2nd and 3rd July 2012 a conference was held in Cairo, made up of the secular orientated, unpopular Syrian external opposition, shortly after the Geneva International Conference held on 30/6/2012, which addressed the Syrian issue and laid down an American solution to it. (It was said that the details of the solution depend on the Egyptian model). The opposition conference was meant to be a supplement to the Geneva Conference. So, its stated aim was to develop a common vision for the post-Bashar-regime stage, such that its decisions are consistent with the decisions of the Geneva Conference. In fact this conference came out with a concluding statement of decisions that were prepared in advance. The evidence for this was that the resolutions (of the two conferences) were in total conformity. Though some of the participants denied any consensus, two matters are obvious in these resolutions:

1. Their consistency with the Geneva Conference, where they waived the removal of the whole regime, calling instead for the removal of the head and symbols of the regime. They demanded "the formation of a caretaker government by agreement between the political and revolutionary opposition forces and the de facto authority, together with those whose hands were not stained with the blood of the Syrians or the looting of public money". The document of the National Pledge also dealt with the future constitutional foundations for Syria - which are justice, democracy and pluralism - the same as demanded by the Geneva Conference.

2. The resolutions reveal how much this external opposition is remote from the thinking, judgment and suffering of the Syrian people; and that it is controlled by a Sykes-Picot mentality; and it differs very little from the puppet rulers. It reminded the people more that this opposition was formed by an international will and a regional plan, which prepared the necessary funding for it and the misleading publicity, and drew for it the dubious aims. It thus became clear that it does not represent the rebelling people at all; and the people have come to see it as part of the conspiracy.

O Muslims rebelling in Sham of Islam:

The friends of the West, led by America, together with their treacherous puppet regimes in the region, and their slaves in the representatives of the external opposition, want to waste your blood in this world and the Hereafter. We, in Hizb ut-Tahrir invite you to deliver a slap to the West by declaring your rejection of its conferences, ideas and way of life, which it wants to impose upon you after the Bashar's departure, through a civil democratic state. So, declare that your objective is to please Allah Almighty, by resuming the Islamic way of life accepted for you by your Lord and your Creator, through the establishment of the Khilafah "Caliphate" state. Cut off the way for the external opposition that works briskly, conspiring against you. Reject them together, and put your trust in your Lord, your deen and your Prophet, Muhammad peace be upon him, in his good news about the rightly guided Khilafah "Caliphate", and that Sham will be the centre of its abode.

Dear supporters from the good influential people in Sham of Islam:

O loyal leaders of our army! O righteous soldiers of our army! We place in front of you your responsibilities, which Allah and your Ummah will account you for - to protect your people and defend them from the evil of the criminal tyrant, Bashar - and those who support the regime from the disbelieving colonial states.

Hasten your movement to a true comprehensive change that turns the table on the heads of the tyrant, his masters and his gang. Act before them, O brave people! Time is running out for the faithful, especially after the Geneva Conference and its aftermath, the Cairo conference - and the planned meeting to be held by the "Friends of the Syrian people group " in Paris on Friday 06/07/2012 - or another similar conference to be held later in Russia. Make this change for establishing the law (shar') of Allah by giving support to Hizb ut-Tahrir, and know that if Allah Almighty wanted to help a group of believers, no one can stop His command; and if He let down some people, their strength will not avail them against Allah, even if they were supported by all the people on the earth. He, the Almighty said:

{إِنْ يَنْصُرْكُمُ اللَّهُ فَلا غَالِبَ لَكُمْ وَإِنْ يَخْذُلْكُمْ فَمَنْ ذَا الَّذِي يَنْصُرُكُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ وَعَلَى اللَّهِ فَلْيَتَوَكَّلِ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ}

(If Allah helps you, no one can defeat you. And if He let you down, who is else that can help you? And in Allah let the believers put their trust).

Have we passed the message to you? O Allah! Bear witness (that we did)!

America has rewarded the re-opening of the NATO supply line with further drone attacks on the civilians and false flag attacks on Pakistan's armed forces.

Kindly give us an overview about the political reality of Myanmar (Burma) and the reasons for the terrible persecution of Muslims there, as well as the regional and international stances towards it, with thanks and appreciation.

Answer: Below is an overview of what is necessary regarding this issue.

1.  The population of this country is more than 50 million, including around 20% Muslims who are concentrated in the capital city of Rangoon, the city of Mandalay and the province of Arakan. 70% of the inhabitants are Buddhists and the rest embrace Hinduism, Christianity and other religions. Burma, however, recognizes only a tiny 4% of the Muslims and considers the remaining Muslims as foreigners. Consequently, it works to expel them and neither grants them the country's nationality nor does it recognizes any rights for them. Hence, they are exposed to attacks by Buddhists, with the support of the government machinery to the extent that they are being killed and forced to emigrate.

2.  The historians mention that Islam entered the country in 788 AD at the time of the Khaleefah Harun al-Rashid, when the Islamic Khilafah "Caliphate" was the leading state in the world for many centuries. Islam began to spread throughout Burma, when the Burmese saw its greatness, truth and justice. The Muslims ruled Arakan province for more than three and half centuries, between 1430 AD and 1784 AD. In this year, the kuffar got united against the province. Subsequently, the Buddhists occupied it and wreaked havoc in the province, killing the Muslims and shedding their blood, particularly their scholars and da'I, besides looting their resources and destroying the Islamic architectures such as the Masajid and schools, due to their hatred and fanaticism from their Buddhist ignorance.

3.  There existed in the region colonialist division and competition between Britain and France. The British occupied and colonized Burma in 1824 AD, whilst the French occupied and colonialized the neighboring Laos. In 1937, Britain separated its colony Burma from "the Government of British India." So, it became a separate British colony to be administered by this government under the name "the Government of British Burma" and the Arakan province was made subservient to this government,t under the control of Buddhists.

4.  In 1940 during the World War II, a movement known as the, "thirty militia comrades - the Burma Independence Army," was established in this colony. This movement was formed by thirty people of Burmese nationality, who received their training in Japan and vowed to expel the British occupiers. They entered their country with Japanese occupiers in 1941. At that time, Burma was one of the lines of confrontation between Britain and Japan, until Japan was defeated at the end of World War II in 1945. Then, Britain once again managed to extend its colonialization of Burma. In 1942 AD, the Muslims were exposed to massacres at the hands of the Buddhists, which claimed the lives of around one thousand Muslims and led to the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of them out of the country. In 1948 AD, Britain granted Burma formal independence and one year later, i.e. in 1947 AD Britain held a conference preparing for independence and called on all the groups and ethnicities in the country to the conference, barring the Muslims. At the conference, Britain laid down a clause stipulating that rights shall be given to every group and ethnicity within ten years of the independence. However, the Burmese government did not implement that and continued persecuting Muslims.

5.  In 1962 AD, a military coup occurred in Burma under the leadership of the military general, Ne Win. He established a military council in the name of the State Council for Restoring Law and Order and ruled the country directly until 1988, with the Council remaining until 1997 under the control of Ne Win In 1990, elections were held and the opposition National Democratic Party got a majority of the seats. However, the military government did not recognize the transfer of power until a new constitution was drafted and continuous meetings have been held since 1993 to draft a new constitution. In the wake of this coup, the Muslims became vulnerable to the persecution from the fanatical Buddhist military rule, which forced more than three thousand Muslims to migrate to Bangladesh. More than half a million Muslims were expelled from the country in 1978, with more than forty thousand of them, including elderly, women and children, dying due to the harsh conditions imposed on them, according to statistics of the refugee aid agency of the United Nations. In 1988, more than 150 thousand Muslims migrated abroad and more than half a million Muslims became subjected to migration and expulsion from the country, in retaliation for their support to the opposition party, which won a majority of the seats in the Council in 1990 AD. The government of the country turned to looking at the Muslims as strangers and not as the inhabitants of the country, depriving their children of education and of marriage before thirty years of age. It even imposed on them a bar on any marriage for a period of three years, so as to reduce their number and the worst practices were implemented against them by the government. in 1989 AD, the government changed its name from Burma in English, to "Myanmar." There are countries which recognized the second name, whilst some other counties recognize and use only the first name.

6. The military continued to rule Burma, sometimes directly supported by the English and at some other times through the British agent India. The system of governance in Burma/Myanmar has ostensibly been made closer to the communist one, to win support of Russia and China, thereby drawing a cover over its reality, just as many regimes in the Arab world draw covers over their loyalty to America or Britain, thereby trying to establish good relations with the communists, particularly Russia and China. America had previously protested India's role in supporting the military regime and its close cooperation with it. France's news agency, whilst reporting the Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh's, visit to Burma on 28/5/2012 and concluding a series of the agreements, stated that "India established good relations with Military Council during the nineties of the last century, particularly in the area of security and energy. In 2010, Washington condemned India's silence on the human rights' violations in Burma. Even Suu Kyi, who completed part of her studies in India, where her mother is ambassador, expressed her grief at India's support for the military rule in her country". In November 2007, the news agencies quoted Washington's appeal to both India and China to stop providing the military regime in Burma with weapons. The military regime in Burma granted China military facilities in its ports in the Bay of Bengal and in the Indian Ocean, with the aim of gaining China's support in view of the US attack on it and also it is in China's interest to establish a port in Burma, towards the Indian Ocean. India shares with China a land border of two thousand kilometers, to its north-east, and India also shares a land border with Burma, to the latter's north-western side, which used to follow the government of British India. And after Britain's formal departure from Burma, India became its guardian and so Burma stood under India's protection and support.

7.  America raised public opinion against the military rule and focused the attention of public opinion on the leader of the opposition, Aung San Suu Kyi, until she was released in November 2010. Then it increased pressure on the military council and raised public opinion against it so that the Council dissolves itself and hands the reign over to the civilians. But Britain along with the government of India treated the matter shrewdly. They prompted the Council to call for general elections, applying the methods that they are well-versed in... So the elections were held in 2010 in which the Solidarity and Development Party won about 80% of the seats, which is the party of Military. The Military Council dissolved itself and handed the reigns over to the civilians. These civilians are retired generals, led by the retired General Thein Sein who took the reigns in March 2011.

8.  America is still putting pressure on the regime in Burma, in order to remove the military regime of retired generals and bring the opposition leader, demonstrating its full support to Aung San Suu Kyi and her National Democratic Party. So, they are publishing future analysis with the possibility of opposing leader winning the general election of 2015 AD. The US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, paid a visit to Burma on 1 December 2011 and announced that her country would appoint an ambassador for the first time in twenty years and that it would ease sanctions in line with progress of democratic reforms in Burma. On 01/04/2011 partial elections were held over 45 seats and the National Democratic Party, headed by opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, won 43 seats. In spite of this, U.S Secretary of State clarified saying, "it is still early to judge how much progress has been made in the recent months in Burma and whether it shall continue to," (as quoted by the French news agency, AFP). In this way the US Secretary of State wanted to exert pressure on the Burmese regime, making the credibility of progress in the democratic process doubtful, because the military in their civil form are the ones who are ruling the country and imposing their control on the political scene of Burma. Under the constitution drafted by the military in the nineties of the last century, a quarter of the seats in Parliament can be appointed by the military, without elections.

Thus, America is not satisfied with the political situation in Burma, although they have made progress by getting the opposition leader released, whose party is undertaking political activity. However they are continuously applying pressure on the regime and apparently questioning its credibility, seeking to apply more pressure so that they can dislodge the military, which is loyal to the British government, from power.

9.  On the other hand, Britain's position was supportive as its Foreign Minister, William Hague, positively commented on what is happening in Burma and said, "The UK, which is regarded as the largest provider of bilateral aid to the people in Burma, stands ready to support the political process in Burma" (Associated Press on 3/4/2012). Its Prime Minister, David Cameron, after the elections, visited Burma and is considered the first Western head to visit Burma, since the coup of 1962 AD. He praised the Burmese regime saying, "Now there is a government which asserts that it is determined to carry out reformations and has taken certain measures in this regard and I think this is a good time to come here and encourage these measures," (according to Associated France Press). He met with Burmese president, Thein Sein, who said, "we are delighted at your support on the efforts we are making to promote the democracy and human rights in Burma." And so, Britain is satisfied with the political situation in Myanmar, being supported by it.

10.  On 3/6/2012, a group of Buddhists attacked a bus carrying Muslim and killed nine of them. In the wake of this mishap, events such as killing and burning of houses and expulsion broke out between Buddhists and Muslims, until it covered several populated areas of Muslims and tens of thousands of them started to migrate from their homes. The government of Bangladesh refused to assist those fleeing to its land, rather it sent them back and closed the borders for them. In the same season last year, Muslims got exposed to similar attacks and were forced to flee the country. For decades, every year they are faced with such incidents of killing, displacement and expulsion from their homes, as well as demolition of their houses at the hands of spiteful Buddhists by the support of Burmese regime. The West, led by America, applauds the new regime for releasing the leader of opposition and for democratization of the country, without paying any attention to the sufferings faced by the Muslims. The US Embassy in Burma issued a statement mentioning that the Charge d'Affaires of the Embassy, Michael Thurston, had met with local Muslim organizations in Yangon and with the National Development Party in Arakan separately. Thurston said, "The most important thing now is that all parties should remain calm and that there is a need for more dialogue which can occur only when there is calm. He further said, "The Embassy encourages the Government of Myanmar to investigate the incidents in such a way that it respects the legal process and the rule of law." (Associated Press of America on 14/6/2012 AD), i.e. America advises the people who are exposed to killing and expulsion that you have to remain calm and you must adhere to dialogue and respect the legal procedures. This is because those who are being killed and made homeless are Muslims. But when the Buddhist monks marched in the 20/9/2007 AD and were repressed by the military regime in Burma, America stood up, raised concern and imposed harsh sanctions on Burma and then other western countries followed suit. This shows that America is not bothered by the suffering of the Muslims, nor does it pay any heed to it. Moreover, it is only interested in realizing its interests and extending its influence and in general this is the position of the whole West, which is hostile to Islam and Muslims.

11.  In summary; the regime in Burma, which in the past was directly controlled by the generals in military uniform, and is now being controlled by the retired generals in civilian dress, is still loyal to the British, who have supported the regime secretly and openly, directly and indirectly, through their agents in India. Also the British have supported the Buddhists in the killing and torturing of Muslims, not only in recent times, but ever since the Islamic rule came to an end in that country.

In their method of political deceitfulness, the British have brought the military regime in Burma closer to the communists from Russia and China, in order to gain their support in case the US launches an attack against this regime.

With regards to the US, it supports the National Democratic Party led by Aung San Suu Kyi and made her win the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991. Her father Aung Sang was opposed to the British and was killed in 1947 AD, with the opposition leader accused of killing him. Her father was considered a champion of the independence.

In spite of the political tussle between America and Britain in Burma, they agree to support the Buddhists in torturing the Muslims, without the West being moved by any alleged humane feelings, except in some hollow public statements. However, they protest if the monks are faced with the repression of their protest or get exposed to prison by any rival Buddhist.

As for China, it supports the regime to achieve the economic and strategic interests therein without gaining any political influence in the country.

And as for the rulers in the Muslim countries, they are subservient to America and the West in totality. So they are completely inactive, even the neighboring Bangladesh does not support its Muslim brothers, who are exposed to severe persecution and ethnic cleansing for over hundreds of years. In addition, not only do they not help them but they also clamp down on those who take refuge in Bangladesh and close the borders for them. These rulers instead of responding to the command of Allah,

{ وَإِنِ اسْتَنْصَرُوكُمْ فِي الدِّينِ فَعَلَيْكُمُ النَّصْرُ }

"and if they seek your help in religion, it is your duty to help them" [Surah Al-Anfaal 8: 72]

respond to America and other Western countries and send troops to other conflict zones, bearing marks of the forces of United Nations on their heads and shoulders!

Good deeds are not expected from these rulers; rather they are bent on evil and the security will not return to the Muslims in that country unless the Khilafah "Caliphate" returns under which they took refuge and sought protection since the rule of Khaleefha Harun al-Rashid and for more than three and half centuries, because it is only the Khilafah "Caliphate" which will provide them security and will spread the good deeds throughout the world and the Khilafah "Caliphate" is, inshaaAllah, on the horizon.

Headlines:

• US Navy stops anti-Muslim training targets after protests
• Syria crisis: Western meddling is Russia's main fear
• United Arab Emirates seeks to recruit 3000 Colombian soldiers
• US concerned by rise in Afghan insider attacks
• NATO supply trucks from Pakistan resume trek to Afghanistan

Details:

US Navy stops anti-Muslim training targets after protests:

Facing Muslim criticism, America's Navy has announced it will stop using cardboard targets depicting Muslim women wearing hijab and verses from Qur'an at a new training range for SEALs in Virginia Beach. "We have removed this particular target and Arabic writing in question from the range in the near term, and will explore other options for future training," Lt. David Lloyd, a spokesman for Naval Special Warfare Group 2, told the Virginian Pilot. The target in question is a picture of the cardboard target, which shows a woman in a headscarf holding a pistol. Published in The Virginian-Pilot on Tuesday, the image shows verses of the Qur'an hanging on the wall behind the woman, which also generated criticism from the group. The Navy announcement came hours after the Council on American-Islamic Relations asked the Pentagon to remove the target, referred to as a "kill house." Capt. Tim Szymanski, the commodore of Naval Special Warfare Group 2, agreed, saying SEALs must differentiate in a split second between civilian bystanders and potential enemies. He also noted other cardboard cut-outs on the range would show people holding animals, not weapons.

Syria crisis: Western meddling is Russia's main fear

Russia's opposition to regime change under western pressure lies at heart of impasse over Syria.For 16 months Russia has blocked UN action on Syria, upheld arms sales with the regime, and lashed out at any suggestion that a solution to end the bloodshed might include the departure of Bashar al-Assad. The initial line was that Russia was acting on national interest, holding on to its last big ally in the Middle East, a significant weapons client and host to its only naval base outside the former Soviet Union. More than one year and an estimated 15,000 deaths later Russia's true calculations are starting to emerge. While the Kremlin remains largely silent about its intentions, closely connected analysts have begun to speak out. Their conclusions - that Russia objects to a western-led world order and refuses to endorse a solution that would further the international community's case for removing unpopular dictators - has overturned conventional thinking on Russia's approach. Ruslan Aliyev, a Middle east expert at the Moscow-based Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, said: "We tried to analyse: does Russia really support Syria because it needs the base at Tartus and because it's a valued arms customer? We came to the conclusion that no, that is not what's driving foreign policy." The consultancy found that about 5% of Russia's arms deliveries, which stood at £8.4bn last year, head for Syria. The base at Tartus, revealed in recent photographs and video published in the Russian media, is little more than a small, rusted, port mainly used for doing repairs. "In Russia, the elite relates very negatively to any attempt at western meddling," Aliyev said. "There's a fear that if there's a new approach to the international system, where the west and UN can change the government of whatever countries they wish the whole world will turn to chaos. Dmitry Trenin, an analyst, recently wrote in an essay for the Carnegie centre, whose Moscow office he heads, that barring a huge shift in the conflict's internal dynamics, Russia was unlikely to change its position. He said: "To Moscow, Syria is not primarily about Middle Eastern geopolitics, cold war-era alliances, arms sales - or even special interests - Syria, much like Libya, Iraq or Yugoslavia previously, is primarily about the world order. It's about who decides. "Not only do the Russians reject outside military intervention without a security council mandate; they reject the concept of regime change under foreign pressure. "This support for non-intervention is unsurprising given that all regimes, excepting established democracies, could be theoretically considered as lacking legitimacy."

United Arab Emirates seeks to recruit 3000 Colombian soldiers:

The United Arab Emirates is seeking to enlist 3,000 Colombian soldiers in the oil-rich Arab country's armed forces, weekly Semana reported Sunday. According to the weekly, 842 Colombian soldiers and retired soldiers have already joined the UAE army which is paying salaries up to ten times what the Colombian state pays the members of its armed forces. The transfer of soldiers to the foreign army is causing unease among Colombia's military commanders because the military fears the higher salaries abroad are draining the army of its best men and women. "They have recruited soldiers with a lot of combat experience, valuable men with years of service in which the Army invested a lot in terms of training," an anonymous general told Semana. "Without a doubt, this is a loss for the army, but there isn't much we can do because it is by no means illegal," the military official added. According to the weekly, the Colombians are making in between $2,800 and $18,000 in the UAE depending on the rank. In Colombia, a soldier earns $530 a month on average. The New York Times reported in May 2011 that the UAE hired Colombian soldiers as mercenaries through a company led by Erik Prince, the founder of controversial private security company Blackwater. According to a Colombian former colonel -- now in charge of recruiting compatriots for the UAE Army -- the 800 Colombians currently active in the Arab peninsula are not part of a mercenary army, but hired directly by the armed forces. "What is happening now is different than before. We are no mercenaries. The contract of the people who travel is directly with the government of the [United] Arab Emirates," the anonymous colonel said. The Colombian ex-official said the UAE are investing in their military defense because the government "noticed that several threats have made them vulnerable." According to the former colonel, the Colombians' responsibilities "range from urban defense against terrorist attacks to the control of civil uprisings and even be prepared for a possible border conflict with Iran." The United Arab Emirates is one of the few countries in the Middle East that has not been affected by the "Arab spring," a wave of revolutionary social unrest that forced four rulers in the region from power.

US concerned by rise in Afghan insider attacks:

The Pentagon says an attack in eastern Afghanistan that wounded several American soldiers appears to have been perpetrated by an Afghan soldier. A Pentagon spokesman, Navy Capt. John Kirby, said Thursday that the attacker fled the scene and is still at large. Kirby said the wounded are in stable condition at a medical facility. He didn't disclose their numbers or nationality, but other officials said the five shot were all Americans. The attack Tuesday was the 19th so far this year in which an Afghan soldier or policeman has turned his weapon on members of the international military coalition. Kirby said a total of 26 coalition members have been killed in those attacks, including 13 Americans. Kirby said U.S. officials are deeply concerned by this year's increase in insider attacks.

NATO supply trucks from Pakistan resume trek to Afghanistan:

After a hiatus of seven months, the first trucks carrying supplies for NATO troops in Afghanistan crossed the southwestern border post at Chaman on Thursday, local officials said. Pakistan agreed to reopen NATO supply routes on Tuesday after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made a telephone call to Pakistan's foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar, and said she was sorry for the deaths of 24 Pakistani soldiers who were killed in an American airstrike along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in November. By noon on Thursday, border officials had allowed three trucks to cross into Afghanistan, according to news reports that quoted Pakistani customs officials. Thousands of containers have piled up at the southern port city of Karachi since NATO supply routes through Pakistan were shut down in the aftermath of the airstrike. The closing became a major sore point between Pakistan and United States, which have a history of mutual mistrust and acrimony despite being partners for more than a decade in the effort to curb terrorism and militancy. Pakistanis have been particularly incensed since a shooting in Lahore in January 2011 that involved a C.I.A. employee. Additionally, the American operation that led to the killing of Osama bin Laden in May 2011 was taken as an affront to Pakistan's sovereignty.