Wednesday, 07 Muharram 1447 | 2025/07/02
Time now: (M.M.T)
Menu
Main menu
Main menu

Certainly the Government's Agency is Involved in the Abduction of Hizb ut-Tahrir Members

On 14 March the Deputy Attorney General read out a letter from ISI in front of the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court, Mr. Iqbal Hameed ur Rehman, and denied its involvement in the abduction of members of Hizb ut-Tahrir. As a matter of fact the ISI accused Hizb ut-Tahrir members of going underground to undertake militant and subversive activities. Hizb ut-Tahrir completely rejects the answer

Read more...

Headline News 15-03-2012

  • Published in News & Comment
  •   |  

 

Headlines:

 

  • No fuel from Egypt to Palestinians despite payments
  • Russia says it will keep selling weapons to Syria
  • British MP: ‘Iran regional superpower'
  • Afghanistan: Cover-up? ‘Several laughing drunk troops behind Afghan bloodbath, burn corpses'
  • Pakistan: US drones 'kill 15' in South Waziristan

 

Details:

 

No fuel from Egypt to Palestinians despite payments
The Palestinian energy authority in Gaza said on Wednesday it had paid Egypt $2 million towards fuel for its crippled power station, but had yet to receive anything in return. Gaza is experiencing a major electricity crisis because of a shortage of fuel for its sole power plant. The plant, which supplies nearly a third of Gaza's electricity, has shut down three times in the past month and most Palestinians are receiving only six hours of power a day. The Palestinians have turned to Egypt for help, and recently agreed a deal which included a provision allowing them to immediately begin purchasing fuel from their Arab neighbour. But the Palestinian Energy and Natural Resources Authority (PENRA) said it had yet to receive any fuel, despite having made a downpayment. "$2 million was transferred to the Egyptian Petroleum Company as a downpayment for the fuel needed to operate the only power station in Gaza," PENRA said in a statement published on its website. "So far, nothing has been received by the station, which has not been operating [fully] for weeks, increasing the suffering of the Palestinian people," it said. PENRA hopes "the fuel enters as soon as possible so that station can resume operations". The plant stopped generating power on March 10, for the third time in four weeks, and was operating at sharply reduced capacity on Wednesday. On February 23, Hamas said it had reached a "comprehensive agreement" with Egypt to end the crisis.

 

Russia says it will keep selling weapons to Syria
"Russia enjoys good and strong military technical cooperation with Syria, and we see no reason today to reconsider it," Antonov told reporters. Russia has shielded Syria, its last ally in the Arab world, from U.N. sanctions over the Assad regime's bloody suppression of an uprising against his government. Antonov said Russia's supply of weapons to Syria is in line with international law and will continue. "Russian-Syrian military cooperation is perfectly legitimate," he said. "The only thing that worries us today is the security of our citizens," Antonov said in a reference to Russian military personnel in Syria that are training the Syrians in the use of weapons supplied by Russia. He declined to say how many of them are currently stationed in Syria. "It's part of our contractual obligations," said Antonov, who oversees military technical cooperation with foreign countries. "When we supply weapons, we have to provide training."


British MP: ‘Iran regional superpower'
A British Conservative MP has admitted saber rattling and sanctions are "having no effect whatsoever" on Iran saying everyone should quit "yesterday's policies and recognize "Iran's status as a regional superpower." "The policy of saber rattling and sanctions has not worked. They are yesterday's policies. Iran is not going to be deterred from pursuing its nuclear program," said John Baron in an interview with Russia Today news channel. "I think we have to be realistic. The present policies have failed. The present policies are heightening tensions. What we want is now to pull back from any chances of military conflict and take a fresh look at the situation and adopt a fresh approach which I think should include an implicit recognition of Iran's status as a regional superpower," he added. Baron further stressed resorting to the option of military force against Iran over its peaceful nuclear program entails disaster stressing the responsibility for any conflict in the region would lie with the US, the Israeli regime and their allies, including Britain. "I think we all know that a military strike by Israel or anybody else would be a disaster for the region. It would ignite Iranian fury. It would not work," he said.


Afghanistan: Cover-up? ‘Several laughing drunk troops behind Afghan bloodbath, burn corpses'
Gruesome new details are surfacing after 16 Afghan villagers including nine children were shot in their houses by at least one US serviceman. Witnesses to the atrocity now say that several drunken American soldiers were involved. ­Neighbors at the village where the killings took place said they were awoken past midnight by crackling gunfire: "They were all drunk and shooting all over the place," Reuters cites Agha Lala, a villager in Kandahar's Panjwayi district. Lala's neighbor Haji Samad lost all of his 11 relatives in the rampage, including children and grandchildren. He claims Marines "poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them." Twenty-year-old Jan Agha says the gunfire "shook him out of bed." He was in the epicenter of the horrible shooting, witnessing his father shot as the latter peered out of a window to see what was going on."The Americans stayed in our house for a while. I was very scared," the young man told reporters.Lying on a floor, Agha says, he pretended to be dead. He added that his brother was shot in his head and chest. His sister was killed as well. "My mother was shot in her eye and her face. She was unrecognizable," he said.


Pakistan: US drones 'kill 15' in South Waziristan

US drone strikes have killed 15 suspected militants in the volatile tribal areas of north-west Pakistan, say Pakistani officials. In one attack, missiles hit a vehicle in South Waziristan, near the Afghan border, killing eight people. Seven people died in a later attack close to the border between North and South Waziristan. Drones often target Pakistan's tribal areas, where many insurgents are active. Pakistan has previously complained that such attacks violate its sovereignty. Officials said two senior commanders of a prominent militant group in the area were killed in the first attack. The group's leader, Maulvi Nazir, opposes the presence of Western forces in the region, but does not order attacks on Pakistani government forces. The US does not normally comment on drone operations, which have killed hundreds of people in recent years, but in January President Barack Obama confirmed for the first time that the covert programme targets militants on Pakistani soil. Those killed by drones include senior al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders, as well as an unknown number of other militants and civilians. The frequency of the attacks has increased since Mr Obama took office in 2008. More than 100 raids were reported in the area in 2010, and more than 60 took place last year.

 

Read more...

Question and Answer Kenya (translated)

  • Published in Q&A
  •   |  

Question:

This question is from two parts:

First: The sign of the presidency electoral campaigns of the Kenyan election began in Kenya in spite of the decision of the high Kenya court which extended the election from Aug 2012 until Mar 2013! In these campaigns it is seen that Ruto is arranging his campaigns together with Kenyata against Odinga while Rotu was with Odinga in 2007 election against Kenyata who was helping Kibaki in his campaign, so how Ruto changed?

Second: Also The ICC accused Kenyata and Ruto with violence after 2007 election, which means as if it helps the successful opportunity of Odinga against Kenyata and Ruto, the British ones. So how the ICC which is beside Europe gives Odinga such chance?

Answer:

For the answer to the first part of the question to be clear, one must review the related events prior to this:

1 - Kibaki was the candidate of the ruling coalition in the presidential elections that took place on 27/12/2007. He is from the Kikuyu tribe, Kenya's largest tribe, which acts as the dominant force, politically and economically, in the country, since independence. He had entered the presidential election race twice, but he failed in 1992 and 1997, before the former President Daniel arap Moi, who remained at the head of the country, from 1978 to 2002. He is a wealthy agricultural investor. He served as Vice President of the African National Union of Kenya, the ruling party since independence in 1963. He won the presidential election of 2002.

2 - Raila Odinga, from the Luo tribe (the third most important tribe in Kenya). He was a parliament member representing Angata area (Nairobi) 1992, which includes one of the largest slums in Africa. During his long career he intensified his political activities and gained many alliances. He is a university professor and industrial investor, known for his skills and wisdom in electoral alliances.
Odinga fought for the presidential race for the first time in 1997, but he failed. He ran for the elections in 2007 on behalf of the opposition Party, the "Orange Democratic Movement," facing Mwai Kibaki.

3- Kenyatta: He is born in 1961, and he was deputy prime minister since 2008. He is the son of the politician well known of his loyalty to Britain, Jomo Kenyatta, the first president of Kenya, from 1964 to 1978. He was the greatest supporter to Kibaki in the 2007 elections. After the elections, he had a great role in the violent events that followed the elections against the group of Odinga and Ruto. He is accused of amassing the Mungiki gang-which is a criminal gang coming from the tribe of Kikuyu, which is the greatest Kenyan tribe that is led by Kenyatta- to carry revenge actions against the tribes of Kalenjin and Luo which support Odinga and Ruto.

4- Ruto: He was born in 1966, in village of Aambu, district of Uasin Gishu. He was known of his ambition to become a president one day. This obsession made him fluctuate in his stances following the change of power centers. He was of the supporters of Odinga in 2007 elections; and he led part of his tribe, Kalenjin, in attacks against the tribe of Kikuyu and the party of National Unity that follows it, which is the tribe of Kibaki and Kenyatta....He hoped Odinga would share with him the authority, such as Odinga becomes the president and he becomes the prime minister. However, the compromise solution was finalized between Odinga and Kibaki (Kibaki became the president, and Odinga is the prime minister), which made Ruto accept to become agricultural minister, but not what he was hoping to be.

5- Putting these specifications of Ruto in the mind of Kibaki who is known to most politicians like the pitcher plant that traps those who get close to it, Kibaki planned to take Ruto to his side... and it seems that a deal has been already concluded between them:
Kibaki would support Ruto to nominate for presidency of Kenya together with Kenyatta against Odinga to bring him down. Then Ruto and Kenyatta would share the authority. Whoever of them wins presidency he would take the other as prime minister; a matter which is suitable for the ambition of Ruto in presidency?
As regarding Kibaki, he is aiming to take Kalenjin in his side, which is the tribe of Ruto, because it is an important tribe; and building cooperation between this tribe and Kikuyu tribe after the previous bitter enmity between them. This would guarantee victory for Kenyatta and Ruto as expected by Kibaki.

6- Ruto was convinced by this because it agrees with his ambition to be president or prime minister! This was the first step of the friendship between Kibaki and Ruto, so in the middle of March 2010 it was an amazing show of craven obedience as Agriculture Minister William Ruto shook President Kibaki's hand at the Eldoret ASK showground.
That handshake, the genuine camaraderie punctuated by the ride in the Commander-in-Chief's ceremonial Land Rover during the opening of the North Rift region's premier event!

7- Matters have been complicated between Odinga and Ruto, particularly after that; so he transferred him on April 2010 from ministry of agriculture to Higher Education ministry; and he then pressurized him to resign. Ruto returned to practise his normal role as Member of Parliament in August 2010. It can be said that since that date at least, he started to coordinate with Kenyatta against Odinga.
Ruto is now the one who coordinates his presidency campaign with the presidential campaign of Ruto against Odinga to share the authority (between them) after the elections as it appears from their activities. But It is clear from Britain's activities that Britain wants Kenyatta to be president of Kenya after Kibaki. It is expected that coordination with Ruto is not other than a political bluff to win his tribe (Kalenjin), following the English way of deception.

• From what mentioned above it is clear the answer of the first part of the question about the change in Rutos stance.
B) Re the answer of the second part of the question it is necessary to revise what happened from the 2007 election:

1- Kenya has witnessed significant violence, since the last presidential election that took place in late 2007, that killed about 1500 and displaced nearly 250,000, before Kibaki and Odinga reached an accord to keep Kibaki in the Presidential position, despite accusations against him regarding election fraud and to appoint Odinga as prime minister.

With all of these crimes, the International Criminal Court only moved effectively after the press conference held by Kofi Annan in Nairobi in March 2010. Kofi Annan indicated that the International Criminal Court is expected to begin the investigation about the crimes which took place after the elections. Kofi Annan, the former Secretary General of the United Nations had an effective contribution in the power-sharing agreement which was reached between Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga, ending weeks of bloody clashes between the supporters of both parties, after the previous general election.

After that, the government of Kenya and the International Criminal Court 6/9/2010 signed an agreement allowing the Tribunal to open an office in Kenya, as a prelude to the investigations in the acts of violence that occurred in Kenya in 2008, nearly three years after the occurrence of such crimes. This agreement came after the visit of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir to Nairobi at the invitation of Kibaki to attend the ceremony of the ratification of the new Constitution of Kenya, which was adopted in August 2010, after a referendum. The International Tribunal considered that visit as a challenge to it and provocation from Kibaki, who hosted al-Bashir even though he is accused by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in the Darfur region.

2- On 15/12/2010, the prosecutors at the International Criminal Court charged six people: the former Education Minister William Ruto, the Minister of Industry Henry Kyprono Kosgei, the former police chief Mohammed Hussein Ali, Information Officer Joshua Arap Sang, the Secretary-General of the Council of Ministers Francis Muthaura, and Kenyatta Deputy Prime Minister, on counts of murder, deportation and persecution, that occurred after the previous election.

Then on 23/1/2002, the Court ordered four senior Kenyan figures, to appear before it to face charges of crimes against humanity, in violence that broke out after the previous elections, where the court said that there is sufficient evidence for their trial. The four were: two possible candidates for the presidency Kenyatta, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Minister of Finance and the son of the first President of Kenya, William Ruto, a former education minister who is backed by millions of voters of the Kalingen tribe, thirdly, the broadcaster of Radio Kenya, Joshua Arap Sang, and fourthly, the President of the Union of the government employees, Francis Muthaura. But there was not sufficient evidence to go to trial against Henry Kosgei, who was the minister for industrialization and a senior member of the opposition party lead by Raila Odinga, and the former police chief, Major General Hussein Ali, as declared by the head of the International Criminal Court, Ekaterina Trendavelova.

3 - As for the impact of these charges; the stances were as follows:

A - President Mwai Kibaki said in a statement that he "cannot be accused as long as the trial court did not recognize the charges against them." He added that "the government will remain cautious and will respect the rights and the dignity of its citizens," calling the Kenyans to "stay calm."

B - Obama urged Kenya to cooperate with the court by saying: "all Kenyan leaders and the people that they serve must cooperate fully with the ICC investigation, and focus on the application of the reform agenda and the future of the nation."

C - The head of the judges stated that the accused is innocent until proven guilty.

D - The two main defendants said that they will enter the election regardless of the court's decision, and that its not permissible for current President Kibaki to run for a third term, but the Prime Minister Odinga may run for election. Note also that the Supreme Court in Kenya has announced on 13.1.2012 that the time for the next presidential election is postponed "in principle" from Aug 2012 until Mar 2013.

It is worth mentioning that the Kenyatta, the political leader of the largest tribes, the Kikuyu of Kenya, is accused of mobilizing the Mungiki gang - a criminal gang of the tribe - to carry out reprisal crimes against the tribes of Kalingen and Luo, the backers of Odinga.
Ruto who was previously one of the Odinga's allies, accused in the violence, he ordered attacks on Kikuyu supporters in the Party of National Unity of the Kikuyu tribe.

4 -In the light of the above the answer of the second part of the question is as follows:

A - The international tribunal is of European origin and motivation. It was procrastinating to intervene because the Kibaki group had a significant role in the violence. Kenyatta is accused of mobilizing the Mungiki gang - a criminal gang from the Kikuyu tribe, the largest tribe of Kenya, led by Kenyatta - to carry out reprisals against Kalingen and Luo tribes, who are backers of Odinga, whilst the Roto, who was previously Odinga's ally, had arranged the other attacks against the supporters of the Kikuyu and its National Unity Party (PRM). However, the biggest role in the violence was from Kenyatta and the supporters of Kibaki. So the Court was dragging its feet so as not to condemn Kibaki and Kenyatta, who are pro-European and pro-British.

B - The United States wants the tribunal, but only after ensuring that it will not come to crucial decisions against Odinga and his faction. She has achieved what she wanted after two events, that were organized by two of her men:

Firstly, Kofi Annan, who is a pro-American, held a press conference in March 2010 and said that the Court will begin its work soon, embarrassing the prosecutor and the court. Then the court made a decision to direct its work after the 6/9/2010 agreement with Kenya.

Secondly, America's agent Bashir visited Kenya and was hosted by Kibaki, the President of the Republic, at a time when Bashir is wanted by the International Tribunal, which made the visit seem like a challenge to the court.

America has been successful in both cases, Annan's statement expedite the start of the court, and Bashir's visit has "somewhat" raised the court against Kibaki and his faction. But the result of the court decisions canceled the fear of America that the court will strongly stand next to Kibaki and Kenyatta. The decisions were semi-balanced and almost prevail in favoring Odinga. Two of the four that the court ordered to appear before the court are from the heavy weights: Kenyatta from the group of Kibaki, and Ruto who was previously from the group of Raila Odinga until the year 2010 when Kibaki succeeded in taking him to his side in order that he can get Rotu tribe "Kalingin" to his side as we detailed in the answer of the first part of the question. Because Kibaki cannot be nominated for a third term, the British are working to appoint Kenyatta in the Presidency, for he is the son of their former agent Kenyatta Senior. If the indictments affected the nomination of Kenyatta and Ruto then this would be in favor of Odinga ... The central issue is to halt the nomination of Kenyatta, because even if Ruto was nominated, his position fluctuates, for his main ambition is to get a post. Therefore, if he was promised of a post, then the problem between him and Odinga would not be difficult.

Therefore, the court's decisions have created a nuisance for Kibaki, and created joy for Obama and Odinga, and it was in this context, that the statements of Kibaki and Obama appeared which referred to previously.

However, it is expected that the court would continue with its accusation and investigation, then procrastinate and delay in the provisions... Therefore, most likely the candidates will continue in their nomination, and that is clear from their statements and the statement of the President of the Court as well as Kibaki's statement, and this is only if nothing new appears on the political scene, for new developments impose new realities...

But in any case, America has succeeded in making the Court's decisions affect the Kibaki group more than Raila Odinga group, or at least affecting them equally, even though the pro-European Court's decisions would have been expected to be in favor of Kibaki's group against Odinga group explicitly.

 

Read more...

O Sincere Army Officers! Be the best of those who answered the call! Your brothers are being slaughtered - So rush to help them by establishing the Islamic State (translated)

Two weeks before the first anniversary of the start of the blessed revolt of Sham we have seen the barbarism of the Syrian regime and the escalation of its daily massacres against the patient believers in Syria; and the fall of approximately 10 000 martyrs, with tens of thousands wounded, detained and displaced across the world under extremely dramatic conditions.

After all these developments, the tone of those calling for arming the opposition and the Free Syrian Army has increased. The GCC countries, led by Saudi Arabia and Qatar have called strongly for arming the opposition. Whilst on the other side, Burhan Ghalyoun, the leader of the Syrian National Council, called in a press conference in Paris on 1/3/2012 for "the formation of a military advisory office....to follow up the affairs of the various forces of the armoured opposition and organise their ranks and unify their forces under one central command". He added: "Arming of the opposition should not be except through the National Council and through its military advisory office only, so that the process of arming does not become in service of political and sectarian agendas". In this context, the name "the Friday of arming the Free Army" came about.

In order to understand the nature of the various calls for arming, we have to be aware of the following facts:

Firstly: These various calls for arming came in the context of the legendary steadfastness of the believers in Syria, and the failure of the criminal Syrian regime in imposing its security and military solution. Since the Syrian people are not armed; the Syrian regime continues its criminal operations against it; and as America keeps delaying any solution, European countries have taken the opportunity to call for arming the domestic opposition through their agents in the GCC countries. The aim of this call is to create an opposition dependent upon those who arm it. All of this is an endeavour to make the alternative regime subservient to them.

Secondly: Thus far, America has failed to prepare an alternative regime to the current criminal Syrian regime. It is aware that the external opposition they forged together is weak and unable to lead a country like Syria. Moreover, its secular image does not conform to the revolutionary believers from the people of Syria who call "O our Lord, we are at your service!"

On 19/2/2012 Martin Dempsey, current chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff made a notable statement saying: "I would challenge anyone to clearly identify for me the opposition movement in Syria at this point." And he pointed out that his country waits till the image of this opposition becomes clear to it, adding that: "until we're a lot clearer about...who they are and what they are...it would be premature to talk about arming them."

On 28/2/2012 U.S. Secretary of State Clinton confirmed policy of procrastination, saying: "Assad would be obliged to step down at the end of the day"... but that she did not know how to "define the end of the day."

Thirdly: Burhan Ghalyoun's statements about forming "a military advisory office" are in harmony with the American approach. This circumvents the rising calls of the GCC rulers loyal to the European, particularly British, policy and contains any arming process within this "military advisory office". He was explicit when he said: "So that the arming process does not become in service of political and sectarian agendas". The White House announced on 25/2/2012 that "arming the Syrian opposition might not be wise at this moment" and confirmed that arming the opposition was not on the agenda of the American administration.

O Muslims in Al Sham, the centre of Islam's land!

America and Europe want neither good for you, and nor reform. Rather they want your servitude and more killing carried out by the criminal Bashar. So do not incline to them. Instead continue on your approach, for you have defeated, through your perseverance, all international conspiracies surrounding you. You must know that real change from Allah comes only by your clean hands and the hands of the of the honest officers and soldiers among you. So, seek their help and motivate them through the pride of Islam and the power of faith. You have been steadfast for your objective to overthrow the regime, and you have shouldered that which great mountains could not bear; so do not let that be wasted. Rather, conclude it as you honestly started it: "It is for Allah! It is for Allah!" by adding to it: "And on the way of Rasoolullah."

O Sincere Army Officers....Be the best of those who answered the call!

The criminal Syrian regime has gone beyond the limit by shedding the blood of your people. So be the best help for them after Allah Ta'ala, for you are the hope. Protect their blood by the stance you take on the side of Allah, His Messenger and the steadfast believers in the blessed land of Sham, the centre of the land of Islam. Uproot this obscene regime from its decaying roots and replace it with the rule of Allah, the rightly guided Khilafah "Caliphate" on the model of prophethood. So be the best of those who answered the call, and thus become the new ansaar (helpers) - descendents of Sa'd ibn Ma'adh; so Islam and its people become powerful by you, and you gain, Inshallah, the reward of this worldly life and the best reward of the Hereafter.

Allah Ta'ala says:

{ الَّذِينَ اسْتَجَابُوا لِلَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ مِنْ بَعْدِ مَا أَصَابَهُمُ الْقَرْحُ لِلَّذِينَ أَحْسَنُوا مِنْهُمْ وَاتَّقَوْا أَجْرٌ عَظِيمٌ }


Of those who answered the call of Allah and the Messenger - even after being wounded - those who do right and refrain from wrong, have a great reward.

Read more...

HIZB UT TAHRIR INDONESIA - REJECT THE RAISE OF FUEL PRICE REJECT THE LIBERALIZATION OF OIL AND GAS

As it is reported the government of Indonesia is going to announce the fuel price raise in the near future matching with the rising price of the world crude oil that exceeds the prices in the state budget. If it is really realized, people live load will increase. It will harm people and increase their burden and never lead to welfare of people.

Read more...

Hizb ut Tahrir organized countrywide protest meetings against the presence of US Special Forces in the country


Hizb ut Tahrir organized protest meetings outside mosques across the country after Jummah prayers today (09-03-2012) against the presence of US Special Forces in the country where speakers said, by secretly allowing the presence of US Special Forces in the country Hasina, the number one terrorist in the country has added a heinous dimension to her collaboration in the War against Islam by America, the number one terrorist in the world. The speakers said Hasina, who has her hands drenched in the blood of Muslim officers, has secretly let in the American soldiers in the country, who have their hands drenched in the blood of Muslims all over the world, so that they may abduct and kill the Muslims of this country. This is exactly what the US Special Forces are known for and this is their job description. They are specialists in conducting extremely violent terrorist acts all over the world. We have to just look at the crimes of Raymond Davis and other American operatives against our Muslim brothers in Pakistan. So why is Hasina allowing them to operate here when she herself said her government cannot guarantee the safety of people in their homes from local petty criminals? How does she plan to protect the people from these global masterminds of extremely violent terrorist acts?

 

Furthermore what are the interests of the country or the military which will be achieved from this? None whatsoever; otherwise Hasina would have no need for hiding it from the people. However the Americans have clear goals and interests they aim to achieve; and they announced it to their people. Their aims are clear from the statement of the admiral. They are preparing the military in so-called counter terrorism. This has one meaning to America - get the military to join in the war against Islam; and fight, abduct, and kill their own Muslims brothers. This is what America will most definitely do, as they did in Pakistan and any officer who refuses to participate in this will be abducted, arrested, dismissed or killed. We need only to mention as evidence for this the Pilkhana killings, the ongoing purge in the military and the killings of 24 officers by NATO forces in Pakistan. Secondly the admiral stated, "South Asia as a whole is of major strategic importance to the US and the security partnerships are increasingly vital to the US Pacific Command's mission." In plain language he is referring to the US design of preventing the return of the Khilafah "Caliphate" in the region and containing China, as part of which they intend to totally subjugate Bangladesh under their domination.

 

The speakers reminded the Muslims of the ayah of Allah (SWT),

 

إِنْ يَثْقَفُوكُمْ يَكُونُوا لَكُمْ أَعْدَاءً وَيَبْسُطُوا إِلَيْكُمْ أَيْدِيَهُمْ وَأَلْسِنَتَهُمْ بِالسُّوءِ وَوَدُّوا لَوْ تَكْفُرُونَ (الممتحنة:2)


"Should they gain the upper hand over you, they would behave to you as enemies, and stretch forth their hands and their tongues against you with evil, and they desire that you should disbelieve." [TMQ Surah Al-Mumtahinah: 2]


They urged the Muslims to take action before it is too late. They said Hasina is committing one after another treacherous acts, openly and secretly. Therefore the people must come out to struggle against her and the ruling regime; and establish the Khilafah "Caliphate" state, which will throw out the crusader forces from the country.

 

 

For more photo

 

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

Site Categories

Links

West

Muslim Lands

Muslim Lands