Declaring a Republic in Syria is a Betrayal of the Islamic Revolution!

News:

Ahmed al-Shara, who made his first foreign visit to Saudi Arabia after taking the Presidency in Syria, made important statements about the future of Syria in line with the political roadmap he has maintained in an interview with Syrian television. Pledging to promote a free market economy and investment facilities, Shara said, "Syria is a country that will preserve its natural state, the form of government will be a republic, there will be a parliament, an executive branch and authorities working in cooperation with each other." he used his expressions. (Agencies)

Comment:

Ahme Ahmad al-Shara disappointed the Syrian people and the sincere mujahideen with his statements after the military operation launched after the people of Idlib had been persistently demanding the reopening of the fronts for years and which resulted in the escape of the tyrant Bashar al-Assad to Russia on December 8, 2024. It also continues to please the Western infidels, especially the United States, and their domestic collaborators in the region.

Shara, who issued amnesty to the remnants of the regime as soon as she took over and invited the people to peace and reconciliation by saying that they would not act with feelings of revenge, is trying every way to ensure that the name of the Syrian revolution is not mentioned with Islam. Every Muslim who follows his politics with reason sees that he behaves as if he is responsible to the West and the international system, and not to the Syrian people. Subhanallah!

Ahmad al-Shara does not mention the decrees and solutions of Islam in any of his speeches, as if he were ashamed of Islam. He speaks as if the creed and order of Islam are not capable of uniting the Syrian people and ruling with justice, as if the religion of Allah does not offer a vision of development. Talking like this, he humiliates both himself and the Syrian revolution. No matter which explanation is looked at, there is concession and surrender! What does it mean to want peace with the Jewish entity when it attacked Syria, destroyed all its military power, expanded its occupation of the Golan Heights? The Syrian people have shouted that they want sharia and caliphate for 13 years, paid great prices for this, while the mujahideen from all over the world have fought on this path, what do you mean by saying "Syria will become an Arab Republic"?

What does it mean to abandon the flag of Tawhid and adopt the Sykes-Picot flag? What does it mean to congratulate the arrogant president of the United States, the colonial infidel, the mortal enemy of Islam and Muslims, who ties Russia and Iran, the biggest supporters of Bashar al-Assad, on the Syrian people, who gave Turkey a role in perverting the revolution, and to say that he believes that he will bring peace and stability to the Middle East? What does it mean to constantly use phrases such as “inclusive government” and “civilian state” to imply and make commitments to Western media outlets that they are embracing democracy? Where is Islam in this? Where is the glory in this? Where is the political view in this? So, will all these statements supposedly made for Syria to rise up really satisfy the Western infidels? No! Because, as Allah has clearly commanded:

[وَلَن تَرْضَى عَنكَ الْيَهُودُ وَلاَ النَّصَارَى حَتَّى تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُمْ]

“Jews and Christians will never be satisfied with you until you follow their religion...” (Baqarah 120)

Every concession made will lead to the next concession. Once the haram has been committed, the other will come easy to the heart. Satan will whisper that there is no other way but to interfere among the unbelievers, saying ‘’circumstances force it." But in the end, these infidels will force Muslims to point guns at their brothers in exchange for their support. As a matter of fact, the assassination of the mujahedeen in Syria shows exactly this situation. These assassinations will be directed at those who oppose Syria becoming a secular and Arab republic under the pretext of “fighting terrorism”; those who are not satisfied with peace with the Jews, those who remind the constants of the revolution and demand the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate in Syria. Ahmad al-Shara said, "We have thrown the dust of humiliation and inferiority over Damascus." his words in the form of will not change this fact. There is no evidence that declares that the Islamic struggle will end after the dictators are overthrown. However, there are many conclusive proofs that inclining towards the unbelievers, entering into their intellectual and political structures, and making friends of the unbelievers instead of believers will cause them to lose in this world and in the hereafter!

[يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ لاَ تَخُونُواْ اللّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ وَتَخُونُواْ أَمَانَاتِكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ]

“O you who believe! Do not betray Allah and the Messenger, lest you betray what has been entrusted to you knowingly.” (Anfal 27)

I ask Allah (swt) to give strength and prudence to the people of Damascus and sincere mujahideen to protect the Syrian revolution from betrayals and traps, and to help all Muslims to make Sharia run.

Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by
Muhammad Emin Yildirim